Loveland David, Boyle Michael
Fayette Companies.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2007 Apr;51(2):130-50. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06287645.
This article reviews the research on intensive case management (ICM) programs as a jail diversion intervention for people with a serious mental illness (SMI). The review includes two types of ICM programs: (a) general ICM programs that included an assessment of arrests and incarceration rates for people with an SMI and (b) ICM programs specifically implemented as a component of a jail diversion intervention for people with an SMI. Results indicate that general ICM programs (19) rarely led to reductions in jail or arrest rates over time, and these rates were similar to those found in standard mental health services. General ICM programs that included an integrated addiction treatment component (8) had mixed results but a trend toward reductions in rates of arrests and incarceration over time for individuals with an SMI and a co-occurring substance use disorder. Results were mixed for jail diversion interventions with an ICM program, but most ICM programs (8) led to significant reductions in arrests and incarcerations over time. Specific elements of effective ICM jail diversion programs are discussed.
本文回顾了针对患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人群,将强化个案管理(ICM)项目作为监狱分流干预措施的相关研究。该综述涵盖两种类型的ICM项目:(a)一般ICM项目,其中包括对患有严重精神疾病的人群的逮捕和监禁率进行评估;(b)专门作为患有严重精神疾病的人群的监狱分流干预措施的一个组成部分而实施的ICM项目。结果表明,一般ICM项目(19个)随着时间的推移很少能降低监狱服刑率或逮捕率,这些比率与标准心理健康服务中的比率相似。包含综合成瘾治疗组成部分的一般ICM项目(8个)结果不一,但随着时间的推移,患有严重精神疾病且同时患有物质使用障碍的个体的逮捕率和监禁率有下降趋势。采用ICM项目的监狱分流干预措施结果不一,但大多数ICM项目(8个)随着时间的推移导致逮捕和监禁人数显著减少。本文还讨论了有效的ICM监狱分流项目的具体要素。