• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳实践:在积极社区治疗团队环境中对拒绝服药患者进行管理的系统方法。

Best practices: A systematic approach to the management of patients who refuse medications in an assertive community treatment team setting.

作者信息

Tam Christopher, Law Samuel

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):457-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.457.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.457
PMID:17412844
Abstract

A significant proportion of patients of assertive community treatment (ACT) teams will adamantly refuse medication. Whether the team should continue to encourage medication or put a hold on advocating for medication is a clinical and ethical dilemma. On the basis of their clinical experiences, the authors propose best-practices criteria that ACT teams can consider in deciding whether medications may be temporarily discontinued when a patient refuses them. The authors suggest that in some circumstances stopping medications in such a case may help in the development or repair of a therapeutic alliance over the long term.

摘要

积极社区治疗(ACT)团队中有相当一部分患者会坚决拒绝服药。团队是应继续鼓励服药还是暂停主张服药,这是一个临床和伦理困境。基于他们的临床经验,作者提出了一些最佳实践标准,ACT团队在决定患者拒绝服药时是否可暂时停药时可以考虑这些标准。作者建议,在某些情况下,这种情况下停药可能有助于长期建立或修复治疗联盟。

相似文献

1
Best practices: A systematic approach to the management of patients who refuse medications in an assertive community treatment team setting.最佳实践:在积极社区治疗团队环境中对拒绝服药患者进行管理的系统方法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):457-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.457.
2
Implementing assertive community treatment teams.实施积极社区治疗团队。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Jul;46(7):679-83. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.7.679.
3
Ethics of assertive outreach (assertive community treatment teams).积极外展服务(积极社区治疗团队)的伦理问题。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;15(5):543-7. doi: 10.1097/00001504-200209000-00013.
4
Scope of agency control: assertive community treatment teams' supervision of consumers.机构控制范围:积极社区治疗团队对消费者的监督。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jul;60(7):922-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.7.922.
5
[Joint decision making--a challenge. A psychiatric patient with end-stage cancer refuses antitumor treatment].[共同决策——一项挑战。一名患有晚期癌症的精神病患者拒绝抗肿瘤治疗]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 May;156(9-10):270-4. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0288-3.
6
Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication: the impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals.对抗精神病药物的态度:临床变量的影响以及与医疗专业人员的关系
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;62(7):717-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.717.
7
[A case of schizophrenia simplex?].[一例单纯型精神分裂症?]
Nervenarzt. 2004 Jan;75(1):63-6. doi: 10.1007/s00115-003-1590-6.
8
Substance abuse and the management of medication nonadherence in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的物质滥用与药物治疗依从性管理
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jun;194(6):454-7. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000221289.54911.63.
9
[Schizophrenia].[精神分裂症]
Duodecim. 2001;117(24):2640-57.
10
Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.介于疯狂与死亡之间:药物执行死刑的争议
Crim Justice Ethics. 2003 Summer-Fall;22(2):3-14. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.2003.9992146.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers' experiences with community treatment orders.职责优先级相互冲突:对社区治疗令下积极社区治疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7.
2
The relationship between consumer insight and provider-consumer agreement regarding consumer's quality of life.消费者洞察与提供者-消费者对消费者生活质量的认同之间的关系。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Oct;47(5):607-12. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9380-2. Epub 2011 Jan 14.