Rost Kathryn, Adams Scott, Xu Stanley, Dong Fran
Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):503-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.503.
Individuals with depression in rural areas showed greater odds of hospitalization over one year than their urban counterparts in a single-state study; however, differences disappeared in models controlling for recent outpatient specialty care. To investigate whether these results are generalizable to a broader geographic area, the research team analyzed an 11-state database to test whether rural primary care patients with depression had greater odds of hospitalization over two years for physical and emotional problems, compared with their urban counterparts.
Hypotheses were tested by conducting a preplanned secondary analysis of data for 1,455 patients with depression in the Quality Improvement for Depression (QID) database. This database was developed in a two-year cooperative trial that evaluated quality initiatives to improve primary care depression treatment. QID studies, including Partners in Care and Quality Enhancement by Strategic Teaming, recruited patients from rural and urban areas.
Multivariate analyses demonstrated that compared with their urban counterparts, rural patients with depression had significantly higher odds of being hospitalized for physical problems (13% versus 7%, OR=1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.2-2.8, p<.01 at six months) and for emotional problems (4% versus 2%, OR=2.3, CI=1.0-5.4, p=.05 at 18 months). Hospitalization differences were not reduced in models controlling for outpatient specialty care in the previous six months.
Although national studies report that all-cause hospitalization rates are comparable for rural and urban populations, rural patients with depression in this 11-site study had greater odds of hospitalization for both physical and emotional problems over two years, compared with their urban counterparts, suggesting that the potential for reducing hospitalization rates among rural patients with depression should be addressed by depression care management programs serving this population.
在一项单州研究中,农村地区的抑郁症患者在一年中的住院几率高于城市地区的患者;然而,在控制了近期门诊专科护理的模型中,差异消失了。为了调查这些结果是否能推广到更广泛的地理区域,研究团队分析了一个包含11个州的数据库,以测试农村抑郁症初级护理患者在两年内因身体和情感问题住院的几率是否高于城市患者。
通过对抑郁症质量改善(QID)数据库中1455名抑郁症患者的数据进行预先计划的二次分析来检验假设。该数据库是在一项为期两年的合作试验中开发的,该试验评估了改善初级护理抑郁症治疗的质量倡议。QID研究,包括护理伙伴和战略团队质量提升,招募了来自农村和城市地区的患者。
多变量分析表明,与城市患者相比,农村抑郁症患者因身体问题住院的几率显著更高(六个月时为13%对7%,OR=1.8,95%置信区间[CI]=1.2 - 2.8,p<.01),因情感问题住院的几率也显著更高(18个月时为4%对2%,OR=2.3,CI=1.0 - 5.4,p=.05)。在控制前六个月门诊专科护理的模型中,住院差异并未减小。
尽管全国性研究报告农村和城市人口的全因住院率相当,但在这项11个地点的研究中,农村抑郁症患者在两年内因身体和情感问题住院的几率高于城市患者,这表明为该人群服务的抑郁症护理管理项目应解决降低农村抑郁症患者住院率的潜力问题。