Walsh Jill S, Plonczynski Donna J
Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL, USA.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;34(2):178-83. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000264832.33979.4e.
We sought to determine whether identification of comorbidities (in addition to daily Braden scale assessment and early aggressive pressure reduction interventions) would impact the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcers (FAPU) of the heel.
Patients admitted to a 333-bed community hospital located 20 miles west of Chicago. Overall, 70 medical records were reviewed, while 242 adult patients (46 in the intervention groups and 196 in the control groups) and 24 nurses participated in the study. The study was conducted in 4 phases, including a retrospective chart audit, 2 prospective interventions, and a product evaluation. Phase 1 entailed a retrospective chart review of patients who were admitted with or developed heel pressure ulcers over a 2-year period to identify factors most predictive of skin breakdowns. Phase 2 included two 10-day aggressive assessment and tailored intervention periods. Phase 3 involved prevalence day assessments of effectiveness of interventions as compared to patients on control nursing units. Phase 4 involved a staff survey comparing effectiveness and satisfaction of the current and trial heel pressure-relieving products.
Risk factors for development of heel ulcers during hospital stay or prior to admission included type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), low albumin, and Braden scale score. During implementation of phase 2 (two 10-day assessment and tailored intervention periods), no heel FAPU were associated with the intervention. During the phase 3 FAPU prevalence assessment, 3 patients had facility-acquired heel ulcers; 2 were in the control group and would have met inclusion criteria if included in the intervention. One patient was in the intervention group but was not following the protocol. During phase 4, there were significant preferences for the trial heel pressure relief device on effectiveness, as well as patient and staff satisfaction.
A pressure ulcer prevention protocol that incorporated accurate assessment of risk factors (Braden Scale and comorbidities) with frequent documentation of heel skin integrity had a positive impact on the incidence of heel FAPU. In addition, early aggressive implementation of pressure-reducing and pressure-relieving devices was effective in reducing FAPU rates.
我们试图确定识别合并症(除每日进行Braden量表评估和早期积极的减压干预外)是否会影响足跟部医院获得性压疮(FAPU)的发生。
患者入住位于芝加哥以西20英里处的一家拥有333张床位的社区医院。总共查阅了70份病历,242名成年患者(46名在干预组,196名在对照组)和24名护士参与了该研究。该研究分4个阶段进行,包括回顾性病历审核、2次前瞻性干预和一次产品评估。第1阶段需要对在2年期间内入院时或发生足跟压疮的患者进行回顾性病历审查,以确定最能预测皮肤破损的因素。第2阶段包括两个为期10天的积极评估和针对性干预期。第3阶段涉及与对照护理单元的患者相比,对干预效果进行患病率日评估。第4阶段涉及一项员工调查,比较当前和试验性足跟减压产品的效果和满意度。
住院期间或入院前发生足跟溃疡的危险因素包括2型糖尿病(T2DM)、外周血管疾病(PVD)、低白蛋白和Braden量表评分。在第2阶段的实施过程中(两个为期10天的评估和针对性干预期),没有足跟FAPU与干预相关。在第3阶段FAPU患病率评估中,有3名患者发生了医院获得性足跟溃疡;2名在对照组,如果纳入干预组则符合纳入标准。1名患者在干预组,但未遵循方案。在第4阶段,对于试验性足跟减压装置的有效性以及患者和员工满意度存在显著偏好。
一个将危险因素(Braden量表和合并症)的准确评估与足跟皮肤完整性的频繁记录相结合的压疮预防方案,对足跟FAPU的发生率有积极影响。此外,早期积极实施减压和缓解压力装置可有效降低FAPU发生率。