Burton Jack D, Castillo Mary E, Goldenberg David M, Blumenthal Rosalyn D
Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Belleville, New Jersey 07109, USA.
Anticancer Drugs. 2007 Jun;18(5):525-34. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3280200414.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands have preclinical and clinical anticancer activity. Most studies in this area address agonists, with relatively few reports on anticancer effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists. Thus, we evaluated the two pure peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists, T0070907 and GW9662, on a panel of hematopoietic and epithelial cell lines. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists and a reference agonist (pioglitazone) were tested in an in-vitro proliferation assay on a panel of seven hematopoietic and nine epithelial cancer cell lines, some of which are chemoresistant. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression was measured by immunoblotting, as was the effect of treatment with these agents on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma levels. The effect of exogenous interleukin-6, an antiapoptotic cytokine, on growth inhibition was evaluated as well as the apoptotic effects of these drugs. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists showed significantly greater potency on all cell lines (IC50s of 3.2-29.7 versus 26.5-78.7 micromol/l for pioglitazone) and greater maximum growth inhibition. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma levels did not correlate with growth inhibition in this panel of cell lines. Combinations of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists and the agonist actually showed schedule-dependent increases in growth inhibition. Exogenous interleukin-6 did not induce resistance to these agents. Both the antagonists and the agonist induced apoptosis, but only the former drugs showed caspase dependence. These two peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma antagonists have significantly more potent in-vitro antiproliferative effects versus hematopoietic and epithelial cancer cell lines. This effect does not correlate with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma levels, suggesting alternative mechanisms or other targets of action. These findings support further translational studies to explore the mechanism of action and therapeutic potential of this class of agents.
过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ配体具有临床前和临床抗癌活性。该领域的大多数研究针对激动剂,而过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂的抗癌作用报道相对较少。因此,我们评估了两种纯过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂T0070907和GW9662对一组造血和上皮细胞系的作用。在一组7种造血和9种上皮癌细胞系(其中一些具有化疗抗性)的体外增殖试验中测试了过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂和一种参考激动剂(吡格列酮)。通过免疫印迹法测量过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ的表达,以及这些药物处理对过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ水平的影响。评估了外源性抗凋亡细胞因子白细胞介素-6对生长抑制的影响以及这些药物的凋亡作用。过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂在所有细胞系上显示出显著更强的效力(吡格列酮的IC50为26.5 - 78.7 μmol/L,而过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂的IC50为3.2 - 29.7 μmol/L)和更大的最大生长抑制作用。在这组细胞系中,过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ水平与生长抑制无关。过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂与激动剂的联合使用实际上显示出与给药方案相关的生长抑制增加。外源性白细胞介素-6并未诱导对这些药物的抗性。拮抗剂和激动剂均诱导凋亡,但只有前者药物显示出对半胱天冬酶的依赖性。与造血和上皮癌细胞系相比,这两种过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ拮抗剂具有显著更强的体外抗增殖作用。这种作用与过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ水平无关,提示存在其他作用机制或其他作用靶点。这些发现支持进一步的转化研究,以探索这类药物的作用机制和治疗潜力。