Suppr超能文献

多排螺旋CT血管造影术在溃疡性颈动脉斑块研究中轴位扫描及不同重建方法的有效性和敏感性:与手术结果的比较

Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.

作者信息

Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Mallarini G

机构信息

Department of Imaging Science, Policlinico Universitario, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):716-23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid plaque ulceration is an important risk factor for stroke, and its diagnosis may be very important to plan a correct therapeutic approach. We hypothesized that axial scans and various reconstruction methods could have different specificity and sensitivity in the study of plaque ulceration. The object of this study was to evaluate their role and diagnostic efficacy in patients with carotid plaque complicated by ulceration through the comparison with surgical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to November 2005, 109 patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy were analyzed using CT angiography for a total of 218 carotid arteries. We assessed every carotid for the presence of ulcerations. For each patient axial image, maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), shaded surface display (SSD), and volume rendering (VR) reconstructions were obtained.

RESULTS

Multidetector row CT angiography (MDCT) found 32 ulcerations; surgical confirmation underlined an overall 93.9% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858-1.021), and a 98.7% specificity (95% CI, 0.961-1.012). Axial scans and volume rendering images demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.9% and 87.9%, respectively); SSD, on the contrary, showed the lowest sensitivity: 39.4% (95% CI sensitivity, 0.227-0.561).

CONCLUSION

Axial scans plus VR reconstruction techniques offer superior depiction of carotid plaque ulceration compared with MIP, MPR, and SSD.

摘要

背景与目的

颈动脉斑块溃疡是卒中的重要危险因素,其诊断对于制定正确的治疗方案可能非常重要。我们推测,在斑块溃疡的研究中,轴位扫描和各种重建方法可能具有不同的特异性和敏感性。本研究的目的是通过与手术结果比较,评估它们在合并溃疡的颈动脉斑块患者中的作用及诊断效能。

材料与方法

2004年1月至2005年11月,对109例行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者进行CT血管造影分析,共涉及218条颈动脉。我们评估每条颈动脉有无溃疡。对于每位患者,均获取轴位图像、最大密度投影(MIP)、多平面重建(MPR)、表面阴影显示(SSD)和容积再现(VR)重建图像。

结果

多排探测器CT血管造影(MDCT)发现32处溃疡;手术证实总体敏感性为93.9%(95%置信区间[CI]0.858 - 1.021),特异性为98.7%(95%CI,0.961 - 1.012)。轴位扫描和容积再现图像显示出最高的敏感性(分别为90.9%和87.9%);相反,SSD显示出最低的敏感性:39.4%(95%CI敏感性,0.227 - 0.561)。

结论

与MIP、MPR和SSD相比,轴位扫描加VR重建技术能更好地显示颈动脉斑块溃疡。

相似文献

8
Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.
Radiology. 1999 Jun;211(3):775-80. doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn42775.

引用本文的文献

7
Imaging Approaches to the Diagnosis of Vascular Diseases.血管疾病诊断的影像学方法
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Feb;24(2):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-00988-x. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
CT imaging features of carotid artery plaque vulnerability.颈动脉斑块易损性的CT成像特征
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1261. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-cass-13.

本文引用的文献

7
Usefulness of multiplanar reconstructions in evaluation of carotid CT angiography.
Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):290-1; author reply 291-2. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261020548.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验