White Elizabeth A, Cho John, Vallis Katherine A, Sharpe Michael B, Lee Grace, Blackburn Helen, Nageeti Tahani, McGibney Carol, Jaffray David A
Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.048. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
To evaluate the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) guidance for setup error reduction and soft tissue visualization in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).
Twenty patients were recruited for the delivery of radiotherapy to the postoperative cavity (3850 cGy in 10 fractions over 5 days) using an APBI technique. Cone-beam CT data sets were acquired after an initial skin-mark setup and before treatment delivery. These were registered online using the ipsilateral lung and external contours. Corrections were executed for translations exceeding 3 mm. The random and systematic errors associated with setup using skin-marks and setup using CBCT guidance were calculated and compared.
A total of 315 CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic errors for the skin-mark setup were 2.7, 1.7, and 2.4 mm in the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, respectively. These were reduced to 0.8, 0.7, and 0.8 mm when CBCT guidance was used. The random errors were reduced from 2.4, 2.2, and 2.9 mm for skin-marks to 1.5, 1.5, and 1.6 mm for CBCT guidance in the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, respectively.
A skin-mark setup for APBI patients is sufficient for current planning target volume margins for the population of patients studied here. Online CBCT guidance minimizes the occurrence of large random deviations, which may have a greater impact for the accelerated fractionation schedule used in APBI. It is also likely to permit a reduction in planning target volume margins and provide skin-line visualization and dosimetric evaluation of cardiac and lung volumes.
评估锥形束CT(CBCT)引导在加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)中减少摆位误差和软组织可视化方面的作用。
招募了20例患者,采用APBI技术对术后腔隙进行放射治疗(5天内分10次给予3850 cGy)。在初始皮肤标记摆位后和治疗前获取锥形束CT数据集。使用同侧肺和外部轮廓在线进行配准。对平移超过3 mm的情况进行校正。计算并比较使用皮肤标记摆位和使用CBCT引导摆位的随机误差和系统误差。
共分析了315个CBCT数据集。皮肤标记摆位的系统误差在左右、前后和上下方向分别为2.7、1.7和2.4 mm。使用CBCT引导时,这些误差分别降至0.8、0.7和0.8 mm。随机误差在左右、前后和上下方向分别从皮肤标记摆位时的2.4、2.2和2.9 mm降至CBCT引导时的1.5、1.5和1.6 mm。
对于本文研究的患者群体,APBI患者的皮肤标记摆位对于当前的计划靶区边界是足够的。在线CBCT引导可将大的随机偏差的发生降至最低,这对于APBI中使用的加速分割方案可能有更大影响。它还可能允许减少计划靶区边界,并提供皮肤线可视化以及心脏和肺体积的剂量学评估。