Goldoni Matteo, Johansson Carolina
Laboratory of Industrial Toxicology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Nephrology and Health Sciences, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2007 Aug;21(5):759-69. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
The study of interactions among toxicants is of fundamental interest and practical importance in toxicological sciences. However, a final agreement on the definition of agent interaction is lacking, and therefore, particular care should be adopted when using the terms additivity, synergism and antagonism, unless the exact toxicological pathways of the compounds studied are known. Two main different approaches, the Bliss independence criterion and the Loewe additivity model, have been generally used in co-exposure experiments. In some cases, they can present dramatically different results, depending on the slope of the pure dose-response curves of single substances. Here, we consider both models in in vitro experiments, where the dose-response curves can be extrapolated. Advantages and limitations of both approaches are discussed, using several mathematical simulations to better explain them, and applying the Hill function for the dose-response model curve. Overall we conclude that the Loewe additivity model is slightly preferable because of a general higher biological plausibility. However, which model to use must be determined case by case and the evaluation can be aided by experimental approaches, such as the study of multiple biomarkers and asynchronous exposures.
毒物之间相互作用的研究在毒理学领域具有重要的基础意义和实际价值。然而,目前对于毒物相互作用的定义尚未达成最终共识,因此,在使用相加作用、协同作用和拮抗作用等术语时应格外谨慎,除非所研究化合物的确切毒理学途径是已知的。在共暴露实验中,通常采用两种主要的不同方法,即布利斯独立性标准和洛伊相加模型。在某些情况下,根据单一物质纯剂量反应曲线的斜率,这两种方法可能会得出截然不同的结果。在此,我们在体外实验中考虑这两种模型,因为体外实验中的剂量反应曲线可以外推。本文讨论了这两种方法的优缺点,并通过几个数学模拟对其进行更好的解释,同时将希尔函数应用于剂量反应模型曲线。总体而言,我们得出结论,由于洛伊相加模型通常具有更高的生物学合理性,因此略胜一筹。然而,具体使用哪种模型必须根据具体情况确定,并且可以通过实验方法来辅助评估,例如对多种生物标志物的研究和异步暴露实验。