Suppr超能文献

下颌骨骨折治疗中颌间固定与微型钢板内固定的比较:一项审计

Intermaxillary fixation compared to miniplate osteosynthesis in the management of the fractured mandible: an audit.

作者信息

Brown J S, Grew N, Taylor C, Millar B G

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wardsley Hospital, Stourbridge, West Midlands.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Oct;29(5):308-11. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(91)90116-m.

Abstract

The hospital records of 30 patients with isolated fractured mandibles treated by intermaxillary fixation (IMF) were compared to 30 patients treated by miniplate osteosynthesis. The treatment variables assessed were the period of hospitalisation, the operating time, the use of intensive care or nurse specialing services, the number of outpatient visits, and the cost of materials. The cost of each facility was calculated from six sources, so that the average cost of each method of treatment could be determined. The results showed that the average cost for managing a fractured mandible with IMF was 1000 pounds if the intensive therapy unit (ITU) was used and 919 pounds if ward specialing services (a single nurse looking after the patient) were used. This compared with an average cost of 794 pounds for miniplate osteosynthesis. The extra cost of the materials if miniplates were used could be discounted by the longer period of hospitalisation, the use of ITU or nurse specialising services, and the greater number of outpatient visits that were required for patients treated with IMF. In addition the use of IMF significantly increased the time patients spent off work.

摘要

将30例采用颌间固定(IMF)治疗的单纯下颌骨骨折患者的医院记录与30例采用微型钢板内固定治疗的患者进行比较。评估的治疗变量包括住院时间、手术时间、重症监护或专科护理服务的使用情况、门诊就诊次数以及材料成本。每个机构的成本从六个来源计算得出,以便确定每种治疗方法的平均成本。结果显示,如果使用重症治疗病房(ITU),采用颌间固定治疗下颌骨骨折的平均成本为1000英镑;如果使用病房专科护理服务(一名护士照顾患者),则为919英镑。相比之下,微型钢板内固定的平均成本为794英镑。如果使用微型钢板,材料的额外成本可以通过颌间固定治疗患者更长的住院时间、使用ITU或专科护理服务以及更多的门诊就诊次数来抵消。此外,采用颌间固定显著增加了患者的误工时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验