Wright Daniel B, Skagerberg Elin M
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Feb;18(2):172-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01868.x.
Many studies of simulated eyewitness situations have shown that under certain laboratory conditions, people's confidence about their identifications predicts their accuracy, but that their reported confidence can be affected by telling them that they chose the suspect. In this study, eyewitnesses (n= 134) to real crimes took part in lineups at an identification suite in the United Kingdom and were asked questions about their memory both before and after they were told whether they had identified the suspect or a filler. Before the eyewitnesses were told whether they had identified the suspect or a filler, their responses to several questions reliably differentiated between those who identified the suspect and those who identified a filler. In addition, responses to the memory questions were affected by telling the eyewitnesses whether or not they had identified the suspect. These results show that postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses and highlight the importance of recording meta-memory variables before an eyewitness discovers whether he or she has identified the suspect.
许多关于模拟目击证人情境的研究表明,在某些实验室条件下,人们对自己辨认结果的信心能预测其准确性,但告知他们所选的是嫌疑人会影响其报告的信心。在本研究中,真实犯罪案件的目击证人(n = 134)在英国的一个辨认室参与列队辨认,并在被告知他们是否辨认出嫌疑人或陪衬者之前和之后被问及有关其记忆的问题。在目击证人被告知他们是否辨认出嫌疑人或陪衬者之前,他们对几个问题的回答能够可靠地区分辨认出嫌疑人的人和辨认出陪衬者的人。此外,告知目击证人他们是否辨认出嫌疑人会影响他们对记忆问题的回答。这些结果表明,辨认后反馈会影响真实的目击证人,并凸显了在目击证人发现自己是否辨认出嫌疑人之前记录元记忆变量的重要性。