Charman Steve D, Wells Gary L
Psychology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Feb;31(1):3-22. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9006-3.
The Department of Justice's Guide for lineups recommends warning eyewitnesses that the culprit's appearance might have changed since the time of the crime. This appearance-change instruction (ACI) has never been empirically tested. A video crime with four culprits was viewed by 289 participants who then attempted to identify the culprits from four 6-person arrays that either included or did not include the culprit. Participants either received the ACI or not and all were warned that the culprit might or might not be in the arrays. The culprits varied in how much their appearance changed from the video to their lineup arrays, but the ACI did not improve identification decisions for any of the lineups. Collapsed over the four culprits, the ACI increased false alarms and filler identifications but did not increase culprit identifications. The ACI reduced confidence and increased response latency. Two processes that could account for these results are discussed, namely a decision criterion shift and a general increase in ecphoric similarity.
美国司法部的列队辨认指南建议告知目击证人,自犯罪发生以来,罪犯的外貌可能已经发生了变化。这一外貌变化指示(ACI)从未经过实证检验。289名参与者观看了一段有四名罪犯的视频犯罪,然后他们试图从四个六人阵容中辨认出罪犯,这些阵容要么包含罪犯,要么不包含罪犯。参与者要么收到了ACI,要么没有收到,并且所有人都被告知罪犯可能在阵容中,也可能不在。从视频到列队辨认阵容,罪犯外貌变化的程度各不相同,但ACI并没有改善任何一个阵容的辨认决策。综合四名罪犯的情况来看,ACI增加了误报和对陪衬人员的辨认,但没有增加对罪犯的辨认。ACI降低了信心并增加了反应潜伏期。文中讨论了可以解释这些结果的两个过程,即决策标准的转变和心象相似性的普遍增加。