Magliano Lorenza, Fiorillo Andrea
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, I-80138 Naples, Italy.
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-34.
A number of explanatory RCT studies published since the 1980s have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of Psychoeducational Family Interventions (PFI) for schizophrenia when provided in combination with drug therapy. In recent years, there has been a shift from efficacy to effectiveness studies and great attention by the researchers in developing training programmes in these interventions for ordinary staff. In this paper, we will provide an overview of the studies on PFI for schizophrenia which have been carried out in the last decade in routine clinical settings or with at least a partial involvement of ordinary staff. These studies have been grouped into: (a) studies comparing PFI with standard care; (b) studies comparing PFI with individual integrated interventions; (c) studies comparing different PFI strategies; (d) implementation studies. The results of these studies reveal that, when provided in clinical settings, PFI have positive middle-term effects on patients' clinical status and disability, and limited impact on family burden. From a methodological viewpoint, these studies had several similarities, such as homogeneity of PFI models and mid-term follow-up assessments, and several differences, mainly in the intensity and duration of the family exposure to the intervention. Future studies are needed to identify the "best dose" at which PFI can be provided in routine conditions at the most convenient cost-benefit ratio.
自20世纪80年代以来发表的一些解释性随机对照试验研究表明,心理教育家庭干预(PFI)与药物治疗相结合时,对精神分裂症具有临床疗效。近年来,研究重点已从疗效研究转向有效性研究,研究人员高度关注为普通工作人员制定这些干预措施的培训方案。在本文中,我们将概述过去十年在常规临床环境中或至少有普通工作人员部分参与的情况下,针对精神分裂症开展的PFI研究。这些研究分为:(a)比较PFI与标准护理的研究;(b)比较PFI与个体综合干预的研究;(c)比较不同PFI策略的研究;(d)实施研究。这些研究结果表明,在临床环境中实施PFI时,对患者的临床状况和残疾有积极的中期影响,对家庭负担的影响有限。从方法论的角度来看,这些研究有几个相似之处,如PFI模型的同质性和中期随访评估,也有几个不同之处,主要在于家庭接受干预的强度和持续时间。未来需要开展研究,以确定在常规条件下能够以最便捷的成本效益比提供PFI的“最佳剂量”。