Suppr超能文献

在急诊室筛查滥用药物的尿液:检测结果会影响医生的患者护理决策吗?

Screening urine for drugs of abuse in the emergency department: do test results affect physicians' patient care decisions?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2004 Mar;6(2):104-11. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500009064.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug abuse is a frequent factor in emergency department (ED) visits. Although commonly performed, qualitative testing of urine for drugs of abuse (u-DOA) is inherently limited in its ability to establish the identity, timing or dose of substances used. Previous studies have demonstrated these limitations, but their designs cannot be used to determine whether the results of u-DOA tests affect physicians' patient care decisions. Our objective was to determine the impact of u-DOA testing on the care of patients who present to the ED.

METHODS

All adults 18 years of age or older who had u-DOA testing in 2 urban teaching EDs were eligible. Victims of vehicular trauma or sexual assault were excluded. Just prior to communicating the results of u-DOA testing for a patient, an investigator interviewed the ordering physician or consultant physician about the patient care plans for that patient. Test results were then revealed, and the questions immediately repeated. This design isolated the impact of knowledge of u-DOA test results on physicians' patient care decisions. Any intended changes in patient care plans reported by the interviewed physician were compared to a priori criteria for substantive change and then subsequently reviewed by an independent expert to determine whether that change was justified.

RESULTS

Of the 110 u-DOA test results studied and the resultant 133 opportunities to influence physician management plans, there were 4 reported changes in management. One management change was judged to be substantive, but none of the 4 reported changes were considered by the independent expert reviewer to be justified. Urine-DOA testing thus led to a justified change in management in 0/133 instances (95% confidence interval 0%-2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Urine-DOA is rarely helpful in guiding patient care decisions in the ED. The results of this study call into question the need for this test in the ED setting.

摘要

背景

药物滥用是急诊科(ED)就诊的常见因素。尽管经常进行,但尿液药物滥用定性检测(u-DOA)在确定所使用物质的身份、时间或剂量方面存在固有局限性。先前的研究已经证明了这些局限性,但它们的设计不能用于确定 u-DOA 测试的结果是否会影响医生的患者护理决策。我们的目的是确定 u-DOA 测试对就诊于 ED 的患者护理的影响。

方法

所有在 2 家城市教学型 ED 接受 u-DOA 检测的 18 岁及以上成年人都有资格参加。车辆创伤或性侵犯的受害者被排除在外。在向医生传达 u-DOA 检测结果之前,调查人员会询问开单医生或会诊医生关于该患者的护理计划。然后揭示测试结果,并立即重复这些问题。这种设计将医生了解 u-DOA 测试结果对患者护理决策的影响孤立出来。采访医生报告的任何对患者护理计划的预期改变都与事先确定的实质性改变标准进行了比较,然后由独立专家进行审查,以确定该改变是否合理。

结果

在研究的 110 个 u-DOA 测试结果和由此产生的 133 个影响医生管理计划的机会中,有 4 个管理上的改变被报告。一个管理上的改变被判断为实质性的,但独立专家评审员认为这 4 个报告的改变都没有理由。因此,u-DOA 检测导致管理上的合理改变的比例为 0/133(95%置信区间 0%-2.3%)。

结论

尿液-DOA 很少有助于指导 ED 中的患者护理决策。本研究的结果对 ED 环境中是否需要进行这项测试提出了质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验