Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Hospital, Private Bag, Footscray 3011, Australia.
CJEM. 2004 May;6(3):161-4. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500006850.
The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater agreement between physicians and nurses regarding eligibility for application of the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) and assessment of the criteria of the CCR.
In this observational study, nurses and physicians independently assessed the CCR criteria in a convenience sample of patients with potential C-spine injury. Data were entered onto separate data sheets. The outcomes of interest were the inter-rater agreement between nurse and physician regarding eligibility for application of the rule, for assessment of each component of the rule and for interpretation of the rule overall, assessed by kappa analysis.
In total, 88 cases were eligible for analysis. Physicians and nurses agreed on which patients were eligible for CCR application in 96.6% of cases. Inter-rater agreement for most CCR criteria was good (* > 0.61), with the exception of midline tenderness (* = 0.58) and range of motion, which most nurses did not test.
This study shows that nurses have the potential to reliably apply the Canadian C-Spine Rule but require further training in the assessment of midline tenderness and range of motion.
本研究旨在确定医生和护士在应用加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)的资格以及评估 CCR 标准方面的评分者间一致性。
在这项观察性研究中,护士和医生分别对潜在颈椎损伤患者的 CCR 标准进行了评估。数据被录入到单独的数据表中。感兴趣的结果是护士和医生之间在规则应用的资格、规则的每个组成部分的评估以及规则的总体解释方面的评分者间一致性,通过kappa 分析进行评估。
共有 88 例病例符合分析条件。医生和护士在 96.6%的情况下对哪些患者有资格应用 CCR 达成一致。大多数 CCR 标准的评分者间一致性良好(>0.61),除了中线压痛(=0.58)和运动范围,大多数护士没有测试。
本研究表明,护士有潜力可靠地应用加拿大颈椎规则,但需要进一步培训中线压痛和运动范围的评估。