• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊护士能否使用加拿大颈椎规则来减少不必要的患者固定?

Can emergency nurses use the Canadian cervical spine rule to reduce unnecessary patient immobilisation?

作者信息

Miller Phil, Coffey Frank, Reid Anne-Marie, Stevenson Keith

机构信息

University Hospital Nottingham, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jul;14(3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.aaen.2006.03.003
PMID:16730989
Abstract

The Canadian c-spine rule (CCR) allows safe, reproducible use of radiography in alert, stable patients with potential c-spine injury in the emergency setting [Stiell, I., Clement, C., McKnight, R., Brison, R., Schull, M., Lowe, B., Worthington, J., Eisenhauer, M., Cass, D., Greenberg, G., MacPhail, I., Dreyer, J., Lee, J., Bandiera, G., Reardon, M., Holroyd, B., Lesiuk, H., G. Wells, 2003. The Canadian c-spine rule versus the nexus low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. The New England journal of medicine 349 (26), 2510-2518; Stiell, I., Wells, G., Vandemheen, K., Clement, C., 2001. The Canadian c-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286 (15), 1841]. This paper reports on a study of emergency nurses' ability to identify patients requiring immobilisation using the CCR. Emergency department triage nurses (N = 112) were trained in the use of the CCR and then asked to use the tool over the following 14 months in the assessment of 460 patients who presented with potential c-spine injury. Trained medical staff repeated 55% of the clinical assessments independently using the rule. The level of agreement between nurse and medical judgement was calculated. The inter-rater reliability using the kappa statistic was 0.6 (95% CI 0.50-0.62 N = 254) indicating a 'good' level of agreement. The majority of nurses indicated they were comfortable using the rule. The results suggest that UK emergency department nurses were able to use the Canadian c-spine rule to successfully guide selective immobilisation. A 25% reduction in immobilisation rates would have been achieved if the rule had been followed. Further studies are needed to test the reduction in levels of immobilisation that could be achieved in clinical practice.

摘要

加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)允许在急诊环境中对警觉、稳定且可能存在颈椎损伤的患者安全、可重复地使用X光检查[斯蒂尔,I.,克莱门特,C.,麦克奈特,R.,布里森,R.,舒尔,M.,洛威,B.,沃辛顿,J.,艾森豪尔,M.,卡斯,D.,格林伯格,G.,麦克菲尔,I.,德雷尔,J.,李,J.,班迪耶拉,G.,里尔登,M.,霍洛伊德,B.,莱西克,H.,G.韦尔斯,2003年。加拿大颈椎规则与创伤患者的Nexus低风险标准比较。《新英格兰医学杂志》349(26),2510 - 2518;斯蒂尔,I.,韦尔斯,G.,万德姆赫恩,K.,克莱门特,C.,2001年。用于警觉和稳定创伤患者X光检查的加拿大颈椎规则。《美国医学会杂志》286(15),1841]。本文报告了一项关于急诊护士使用CCR识别需要固定的患者的能力的研究。急诊科分诊护士(N = 112)接受了CCR使用培训,然后在接下来的14个月里被要求使用该工具评估460名可能存在颈椎损伤的患者。经过培训的医务人员独立使用该规则重复了55%的临床评估。计算了护士和医生判断之间的一致程度。使用kappa统计量的评分者间信度为0.6(95%可信区间0.50 - 0.62,N = 254),表明一致程度“良好”。大多数护士表示他们对使用该规则感到满意。结果表明,英国急诊科护士能够使用加拿大颈椎规则成功指导选择性固定。如果遵循该规则,固定率将降低25%。需要进一步研究以测试在临床实践中可实现的固定水平降低情况。

相似文献

1
Can emergency nurses use the Canadian cervical spine rule to reduce unnecessary patient immobilisation?急诊护士能否使用加拿大颈椎规则来减少不必要的患者固定?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jul;14(3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 30.
2
The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.护理人员对加拿大颈椎规则进行的院外验证。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):663-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
3
Perceived facilitators and barriers to clinical clearance of the cervical spine by emergency department nurses: A major step towards changing practice in the emergency department.急诊科护士对颈椎临床检查的促进因素和障碍的认知:迈向改变急诊科实践的重要一步。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2011 Jan;19(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2009.12.002.
4
The safety of nurse clearance of the cervical spine using the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria.
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Aug;19(4):372-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00995.x.
5
Patient dependency in the emergency department (ED): reliability and validity of the Jones Dependency Tool (JDT).急诊科患者依赖性:琼斯依赖性工具(JDT)的可靠性和有效性。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Oct;14(4):219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
6
Triage in emergency departments: national survey.急诊科的分诊:全国性调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01191.x.
7
Competence profiles of recently registered nurses working in intensive and emergency settings.在重症和急诊环境中工作的新注册护士的能力概况。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Nov;15(8):792-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2007.00768.x.
8
The effects of specific educational preparation on emergency nurses' clinical decisions regarding supplemental oxygen administration.特定教育准备对急诊护士关于补充氧气给药的临床决策的影响。
Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Jun;8(2):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00252.x.
9
Deliberate self-harm: emergency department nurses' attitudes, triage and care intentions.蓄意自伤:急诊科护士的态度、分诊及护理意愿
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1704-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01555.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
10
The Canadian CT Head Rule Study for patients with minor head injury: rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation).加拿大轻微头部损伤患者CT头部检查规则研究:第一阶段(推导阶段)的基本原理、目标和方法
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;38(2):160-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.116796.

引用本文的文献

1
NEXUS vs. Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) in Predicting Cervical Spine Injuries; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.NEXUS与加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)在预测颈椎损伤方面的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 29;11(1):e66. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2143. eCollection 2023.
2
The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study.阿姆斯特丹腕部规则降低疑似桡骨远端骨折后放射摄影的需求:一项实施研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun;46(3):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01194-2. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
3
Clinician's Commentary on Belot et al..
临床医生对贝洛特等人的评论。
Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):290-291. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-32-CC.
4
Does Every Patient Require Imaging after Cervical Spine Trauma? A Knowledge Translation Project to Support Evidence-Informed Practice for Physiotherapists.每位颈椎创伤患者都需要进行影像学检查吗?一项知识转化项目,以支持物理治疗师基于证据的实践。
Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):280-289. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-32.
5
Implementation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules.阿姆斯特丹小儿腕部规则的实施
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Oct;48(11):1612-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4186-9. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
6
Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.用于筛查颈部钝性创伤的清醒低风险患者颈椎损伤的临床预测规则的有效性和可靠性:第2部分。来自颈椎评估与诊断研究评估(CADRE)协作组的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1219-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.创伤患者院前使用颈托:一项批判性综述。
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Mar 15;31(6):531-40. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3094. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8
Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review.加拿大颈椎规则和 NEXUS 筛查钝性创伤后患者临床重要颈椎损伤的准确性:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2012 Nov 6;184(16):E867-76. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120675. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.多中心前瞻性验证分诊护士在急诊科使用加拿大颈椎规则。
CMAJ. 2010 Aug 10;182(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091430. Epub 2010 May 10.