Duvillard C, Polycarpe E, Romanet P, Chauffert B
Service d'Otorhinolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervicofaciale, Hôpital Général, CHU de Dijon, 21033 Dijon cedex, France.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2007 Jun;124(2):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aorl.2006.08.004.
Intratumoral chemotherapy consists in the direct intratumoral injection of the anticancer drugs. Despite its simple and logical principle it remains relatively little used.
This work reviews and analyses the national and international literature about experimental and clinical studies of intratumoral chemotherapy.
Numerous experimental studies validated its theoretical advantages compared with the intravenous one: drug intratumoral concentration increase, antitumoral activity improvement and systemic toxicity decrease. But they also underlined its limits: the high clearance and the non-homogeneous drug diffusion. Research works led to the improvement of the results and performed clinical trials with slow release devices (microspheres, collagen matrix with or without vasoconstrictive agent), anticancer drug in an aqueous solution with a vasoconstrictive agent, intratumoral injection in association with electrochemotherapy or radiotherapy. These trials showed the feasibility of this technique with, in recurrent tumors, response rate between 27 and 50% and an increase in quality of life. The more frequent adverse effects were pain in 24 to 80% of cases, ulceration, necrosis and oedema of the treated locations in 53 to 87,4% of cases and during the use of vasoconstrictive agents systemic effects like arterial hypertension and extrasystoles.
Intratumoral chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic even when used after the classical treatments. Improvements are necessary to define the best drugs, injection technique, treatment periodicity and indications. Intratumoral chemotherapy deserves better interest at the moment where drugs and antibodies limit their action to the cancer cells preserving the healthy ones.
瘤内化疗是指将抗癌药物直接注射到肿瘤内部。尽管其原理简单合理,但使用相对较少。
本研究回顾并分析了国内外有关瘤内化疗的实验和临床研究文献。
大量实验研究证实了其与静脉化疗相比的理论优势:提高肿瘤内药物浓度、增强抗肿瘤活性并降低全身毒性。但这些研究也强调了其局限性:高清除率和药物扩散不均匀。研究工作致力于改善结果,并开展了相关临床试验,采用缓释装置(微球、含或不含血管收缩剂的胶原基质)、含血管收缩剂的水溶液中的抗癌药物、联合电化学疗法或放射疗法的瘤内注射。这些试验表明了该技术的可行性,在复发性肿瘤中,缓解率在27%至50%之间,生活质量有所提高。较常见的不良反应包括:24%至80%的病例出现疼痛,53%至87.4%的病例出现治疗部位的溃疡、坏死和水肿,在使用血管收缩剂时出现动脉高血压和早搏等全身效应。
瘤内化疗即使在经典治疗后使用也是一种有效的治疗方法。有必要进行改进,以确定最佳药物、注射技术、治疗周期和适应症。在药物和抗体仅作用于癌细胞而保护健康细胞的当下,瘤内化疗值得更多关注。