Boinot L, Gautreau G, Defossez G, Daban A, Bourgeois H, Migeot V, Ingrand P
Département d'information médicale, CHU de Poitiers, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Apr;55(2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2006.11.003.
Health care network should promote better quality, equity and care efficacy. On the subject of breast cancer, literature has shown inequality in care depending on geographical areas and health centres locations. This article illustrates a method of analysis of female non in situ non metastatic breast cancer patients hospital care pathway, from the 2002 and 2003 Poitou-Charentes' county Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG's) data bases. The treatments several phases are described along with their combination. The number of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions per patient are each analysed for comparison between Health Centres, Health Centres Status, and in view of the referentials recommendations. Several health pathways options are quantified: Mono/pluri Health Centres sites, inside/outside a geographical department, inside/outside Poitou-Charentes county. Nine hundred and nine patients hospital care pathways are described. Surgery was more often partial (66%), with Health Centres variation between 17 and 68%. Among the 308 patients who had chemotherapy, 78% received between 4 and 6 sessions, with variation per Health Centre between 65 and 90%. Radiotherapy is difficult to trace because of the Health Centres non systematic radiotherapy sessions linkage, and private Health Centres lack of information (no DRG's). 91% of identified radiotherapy benefiting patients had 25 to 35 sessions, in conformation with recommendations depending on the surgery performed with Health Centres variation ratio between 76 and 96%. Hospital care pathways options between two type of treatments were identified. 90% of the hospital care pathways took place in the same geographical department, and 30% took place in public Health Centres alone. Despite radiotherapy tractability limits, proper DRG's data collection allows the description of health pathways between Health Centres and allows health practice disparity identification. Using this tool, in accordance with the Cancer Plan, can therefore help health networks in evaluating care pathway in cancer and many other fields.
医疗保健网络应促进更高的质量、公平性和护理效果。关于乳腺癌,文献表明,护理存在不平等现象,这取决于地理区域和健康中心的位置。本文阐述了一种分析2002年和2003年普瓦图-夏朗德省诊断相关分组(DRG)数据库中女性非原位非转移性乳腺癌患者医院护理路径的方法。描述了治疗的几个阶段及其组合。分析了每位患者的化疗和放疗疗程数量,以便在健康中心、健康中心状态之间进行比较,并参考相关建议。对几种健康路径选项进行了量化:单/多健康中心地点、地理区域内/外、普瓦图-夏朗德省内/外。描述了909名患者的医院护理路径。手术多为局部手术(66%),各健康中心的比例在17%至68%之间。在308名接受化疗的患者中,78%接受了4至6个疗程,各健康中心的比例在65%至90%之间。由于健康中心放疗疗程的记录不系统,且私立健康中心缺乏信息(无DRG数据),放疗情况难以追踪。91%确诊受益于放疗的患者接受了25至35个疗程,这符合根据所进行的手术提出的建议,各健康中心的比例在76%至96%之间。确定了两种治疗方式之间的医院护理路径选项。90%的医院护理路径发生在同一地理区域内,30%仅发生在公共健康中心。尽管放疗追踪存在局限性,但适当的DRG数据收集能够描述各健康中心之间的健康路径,并识别健康实践中的差异。因此,使用该工具并根据癌症计划,有助于医疗网络评估癌症及许多其他领域的护理路径。