• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国是欧洲减少社会排斥的良好典范吗?

Is the United States a good model for reducing social exclusion in Europe?

作者信息

Schmitt John, Zipperer Ben

机构信息

Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC 20009, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(1):15-45. doi: 10.2190/2550-1561-6L53-4636.

DOI:10.2190/2550-1561-6L53-4636
PMID:17436984
Abstract

Advocates of U.S.-style labor market flexibility have long argued that Europe could generate jobs and lower unemployment if the continent's economies followed the example of the United States. More recently, proponents of the U.S. model have suggested that labor market deregulation also holds out the possibility of reducing the problem of "social exclusion" in Europe, primarily because unemployment is one of the worst forms of social exclusion and contributes to other forms of social marginalization. The authors review a broad range of social and economic indicators and conclude that the United States fares poorly compared with much of Europe on social measures. Meanwhile, U.S.-style flexibility has had only mixed success in improving employment outcomes, and the U.S. economy consistently provides lower levels of economic mobility than economies in Europe.

摘要

长期以来,主张美国式劳动力市场灵活性的人士一直认为,如果欧洲大陆的经济体效仿美国,就能创造就业机会并降低失业率。最近,美国模式的支持者提出,劳动力市场放松管制还有望减少欧洲的“社会排斥”问题,主要是因为失业是最严重的社会排斥形式之一,还会导致其他形式的社会边缘化。作者审视了一系列广泛的社会和经济指标,得出的结论是,在社会指标方面,美国与欧洲大部分国家相比表现不佳。与此同时,美国式的灵活性在改善就业成果方面成效不一,而且美国经济的经济流动性始终低于欧洲经济体。

相似文献

1
Is the United States a good model for reducing social exclusion in Europe?美国是欧洲减少社会排斥的良好典范吗?
Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(1):15-45. doi: 10.2190/2550-1561-6L53-4636.
2
Neoliberalism, "globalization," unemployment, inequalities, and the welfare state.新自由主义、“全球化”、失业、不平等与福利国家。
Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(4):607-82. doi: 10.2190/Y3X7-RG7E-6626-FVPT.
3
Jobs for all, economic justice, and the challenge of welfare "reform".全民就业、经济公平以及福利“改革”的挑战。
J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(3):302-24.
4
Some aspects of social exclusion: do they influence suicide mortality?社会排斥的某些方面:它们是否会影响自杀死亡率?
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 May;59(3):232-8. doi: 10.1177/0020764011431792. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
5
TANF over time: the tale of three studies.随时间推移的临时援助家庭补助计划:三项研究的故事
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2012 Aug;13(3):130-41. doi: 10.1177/1527154412456433. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
The fallacies in arguing that current high unemployment in Spain (27%) is a consequence of supposed labor market rigidities.认为西班牙当前 27%的高失业率是由于所谓的劳动力市场僵化造成的这种观点是错误的。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):269-72. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.2.e.
7
How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part I: The impact of recession and deindustrialization.宏观层面的环境和政策如何影响慢性病和残疾人的就业机会?第一部分:经济衰退和去工业化的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):395-413. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.a.
8
Labor force participation, household composition and sponsorship among Southeast Asian refugees.东南亚难民的劳动力参与、家庭构成与赞助情况
Int Migr Rev. 1986 Summer;20(2):381-404.
9
Deprivation in London wards: mortality and unemployment trends in the 1980's.伦敦各选区的贫困状况:20世纪80年代的死亡率和失业趋势。
Statistician. 1988;37(4-5):451-72.
10
Social differences in illness and health-related exclusion from the labour market in Denmark from 1987 to 1994.1987年至1994年丹麦疾病及与健康相关的劳动力市场排斥方面的社会差异。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;55:19-30.