Place Rick C, Hanfling Dan, Howell John M, Mayer Thom A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2007 Mar;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.0011.
Since the 2001 anthrax attacks, an extensive body of literature has evolved, but there has been a limited focus on the management of pediatric-specific issues. We looked at the symptom complexes of all pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department of our hospital during this period and examined whether their presentations would likely allow current guidelines to be used as potential screening criteria to identify children infected with anthrax.
We retrospectively reviewed emergency department records of all adult and pediatric patients (up to the age of 21 years) at Inova Fairfax Hospital during this time, when a large, and at the time ill-defined, group in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area was at risk for pulmonary anthrax. Two cases of anthrax infection were identified at this hospital in exposed adult postal workers. Screening algorithms (described by Mayer et al. and Hupert et al.) were applied to adult and pediatric patients with the presence of fever (38 degrees C), tachycardia, or other symptoms compatible with pulmonary anthrax. Specifically, the usefulness of these guidelines as potential screening tools to identify possibly infected children was examined.
Of 767 pediatric patients seen in the emergency department during the study period, 312 met criteria for review (41%; 95% CI: 37-44%). Four adult patients (0.4%; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9%) had at least five clinical symptoms, fever, and tachycardia; two of them had inhalational anthrax. No pediatric patient presented with five or more clinical symptoms. Twelve children (3.9%; 95% CI: 2-6.6%) presented with four clinical symptoms; five of the 12 had neither fever nor tachycardia. Children, particularly infants and toddlers, presented with nonspecific symptom complexes primarily limited to fever, vomiting, cough, and trouble breathing.
Existing guidelines are likely to be unreliable as a screening tool for inhalational anthrax in children, largely because of the children's inability to adequately communicate a suggestive symptom complex.
自2001年炭疽袭击事件以来,涌现出了大量文献,但对儿科特定问题管理的关注有限。我们研究了在此期间到我院急诊科就诊的所有儿科患者的症状组合,并检查了他们的症状表现是否可能使当前指南用作识别感染炭疽儿童的潜在筛查标准。
我们回顾性审查了在此期间弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯医院所有成人和儿科患者(年龄至21岁)的急诊科记录,当时华盛顿特区大都市地区有一大群且当时情况不明的人有感染肺炭疽的风险。在这家医院的成年邮政工作人员中发现了2例炭疽感染病例。将筛查算法(由梅耶等人和胡珀特等人描述)应用于出现发热(38摄氏度)、心动过速或其他与肺炭疽相符症状的成人和儿科患者。具体而言,研究了这些指南作为识别可能感染儿童的潜在筛查工具的实用性。
在研究期间到急诊科就诊的767名儿科患者中,312名符合审查标准(41%;95%置信区间:37 - 44%)。4名成年患者(0.4%;95%置信区间:0.1 - 0.9%)至少有5种临床症状、发热和心动过速;其中2人患有吸入性炭疽。没有儿科患者出现5种或更多临床症状。12名儿童(3.9%;95%置信区间:2 - 6.6%)出现4种临床症状;这12名儿童中有5名既无发热也无心动过速。儿童,尤其是婴幼儿,主要表现为非特异性症状组合,主要限于发热、呕吐、咳嗽和呼吸困难。
现有指南作为儿童吸入性炭疽的筛查工具可能不可靠,主要原因是儿童无法充分传达提示性症状组合。