Suppr超能文献

椎体后凸成形术和椎体成形术:证据有多可靠?

Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

作者信息

McKiernan Fergus E

机构信息

Center for Bone Diseases, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 North Oak, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.

出版信息

Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Apr;9(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11926-007-0023-0.

Abstract

The absence of Level I evidence undermines the credibility of all clinical studies pertaining to percutaneous vertebral augmentation (ie, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty). The powerful desire to relieve suffering in the frail elderly cannot substitute for a rigorously designed randomized controlled trial comparing vertebral augmentation with continued nonoperative care. Though the level of available evidence is currently inadequate, its quality is improving.

摘要

缺乏一级证据削弱了所有与经皮椎体强化术(即椎体后凸成形术和椎体成形术)相关临床研究的可信度。减轻体弱老年人痛苦的强烈愿望不能替代一项设计严谨的随机对照试验,该试验需比较椎体强化术与持续非手术治疗的效果。尽管目前可用证据的水平不足,但其质量正在提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验