Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯顺势疗法:再次回归常态。

Bayesian homeopathy: talking normal again.

作者信息

Rutten A L B

机构信息

Commissie Methode en Validering VHAN (Dutch Association of Homeopathic Physicians), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Homeopathy. 2007 Apr;96(2):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.03.004.

Abstract

Homeopathy has a communication problem: important homeopathic concepts are not understood by conventional colleagues. Homeopathic terminology seems to be comprehensible only after practical experience of homeopathy. The main problem lies in different handling of diagnosis. In conventional medicine diagnosis is the starting point for randomised controlled trials to determine the effect of treatment. In homeopathy diagnosis is combined with other symptoms and personal traits of the patient to guide treatment and predict response. Broadening our scope to include diagnostic as well as treatment research opens the possibility of multi factorial reasoning. Adopting Bayesian methodology opens the possibility of investigating homeopathy in everyday practice and of describing some aspects of homeopathy in conventional terms.

摘要

顺势疗法存在一个沟通问题

传统医学的同行们并不理解重要的顺势疗法概念。顺势疗法术语似乎只有在有了顺势疗法的实践经验之后才能理解。主要问题在于诊断方式的不同。在传统医学中,诊断是确定治疗效果的随机对照试验的起点。在顺势疗法中,诊断与患者的其他症状和个人特质相结合,以指导治疗并预测反应。拓宽我们的研究范围,将诊断研究和治疗研究都包括在内,就开启了多因素推理的可能性。采用贝叶斯方法,就有可能在日常实践中研究顺势疗法,并以传统术语描述顺势疗法的某些方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验