Feng Felix Y, Lopez Carlos A, Normolle Daniel P, Varambally Sooryanarayana, Li Xiaoxin, Chun Patrick Y, Davis Mary A, Lawrence Theodore S, Nyati Mukesh K
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2512-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2582.
To optimally integrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors into the clinical treatment of head and neck cancer, two important questions must be answered: (a) does EGFR inhibition add to the effects of radiochemotherapy, and (b) if so, which method of inhibiting EGFR is superior (an EGFR antibody versus a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor)? We designed an in vivo study to address these questions.
Nude mice with UMSCC-1 head and neck cancer xenografts received either single, double, or triple agent therapy with an EGFR inhibitor (either cetuximab or gefitinib), gemcitabine, and/or radiation for 3 weeks. Tumor volumes and animal weights were measured for up to 15 weeks. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were done on tumors treated with either cetuximab or gefitinib alone.
The addition of an EGFR inhibitor significantly delayed the tumor volume doubling time, from a median of 40 days with radiochemotherapy (gemcitabine and radiation) alone, to 106 days with cetuximab and 66 days with gefitinib (both P < 0.005). Cetuximab resulted in significantly less weight loss than gefitinib. Immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescent staining of tumors show that although levels of phosphorylated AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase were decreased similarly in response to cetuximab or gefitinib, cetuximab caused prolonged suppression of pEGFR, pSTAT3, and Bcl(XL) compared with gefitinib.
EGFR inhibition, particularly with cetuximab, improves the effectiveness of radiochemotherapy in this model of head and neck cancer. The correlation of response with prolonged suppression of EGFR, STAT3, and Bcl(XL) offers the possibility that these may be candidate biomarkers for response.
为了将表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂最佳地整合到头颈部癌的临床治疗中,必须回答两个重要问题:(a)EGFR抑制是否能增强放化疗的效果,以及(b)如果是这样,哪种抑制EGFR的方法更具优势(EGFR抗体与小分子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比)?我们设计了一项体内研究来解决这些问题。
将患有UMSCC-1头颈部癌异种移植瘤的裸鼠接受单药、双药或三药联合治疗,治疗药物包括EGFR抑制剂(西妥昔单抗或吉非替尼)、吉西他滨和/或放疗,持续3周。测量肿瘤体积和动物体重长达15周。对单独用西妥昔单抗或吉非替尼治疗的肿瘤进行免疫印迹和免疫荧光染色。
添加EGFR抑制剂显著延迟了肿瘤体积倍增时间,从单独放化疗(吉西他滨和放疗)时的中位40天,延长至使用西妥昔单抗时的106天和使用吉非替尼时的66天(两者P<0.005)。西妥昔单抗导致的体重减轻明显少于吉非替尼。肿瘤的免疫印迹分析和免疫荧光染色显示,尽管西妥昔单抗或吉非替尼对磷酸化AKT和细胞外信号调节激酶水平的降低作用相似,但与吉非替尼相比,西妥昔单抗能更持久地抑制pEGFR、pSTAT3和Bcl(XL)。
EGFR抑制,尤其是使用西妥昔单抗,可提高该头颈部癌模型中放化疗的有效性。疗效与EGFR、STAT3和Bcl(XL)的持续抑制之间的相关性提示这些可能是疗效的候选生物标志物。