• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创瓣膜手术

Minimally invasive valve surgery.

作者信息

Soltesz Edward G, Cohn Lawrence H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Rev. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):109-15. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000233769.92470.75.

DOI:10.1097/01.crd.0000233769.92470.75
PMID:17438376
Abstract

Minimally invasive heart valve surgery has evolved significantly over the past 10 years and now comprises safe and efficient operations for most patients. The main goals of minimally invasive heart valve surgery are to reduce surgical trauma, increase patient satisfaction, reduce morbidity, and lower costs while still providing durable and safe valve repair or replacement. After a decade of refinements, studies have shown that minimally invasive heart valve surgery is a safe and effective procedure with similar if not improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates compared with conventional valve surgery. Patients derive a variety of tangible benefits from these new surgical approaches, including less pain, shorter lengths of hospital stay, and faster return to preoperative functional levels. Minimally invasive heart valve surgery should be an option for any patient undergoing heart valve surgery today.

摘要

在过去十年中,微创心脏瓣膜手术有了显著发展,现在对大多数患者而言已包括安全且高效的手术。微创心脏瓣膜手术的主要目标是减少手术创伤、提高患者满意度、降低发病率并降低成本,同时仍能提供持久且安全的瓣膜修复或置换。经过十年的完善,研究表明,与传统瓣膜手术相比,微创心脏瓣膜手术是一种安全有效的手术,围手术期发病率和死亡率即便没有改善也相近。患者从这些新的手术方法中获得了各种切实的益处,包括疼痛减轻、住院时间缩短以及更快恢复到术前功能水平。如今,微创心脏瓣膜手术应成为任何接受心脏瓣膜手术患者的一种选择。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive valve surgery.微创瓣膜手术
Cardiol Rev. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):109-15. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000233769.92470.75.
2
Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: already established in clinical routine?微创心脏瓣膜手术:已在临床常规中确立了吗?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004 Nov;2(6):837-43. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2.6.837.
3
Minimally invasive valve surgery.微创瓣膜手术
Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Aug;89(4):923-49, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.05.005.
4
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第3部分——瓣膜置换加冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
5
Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: early and mid-term results.微创再次手术孤立瓣膜手术:早期和中期结果
J Card Surg. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):240-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00271.x.
6
A decade of minimally invasive mitral repair: long-term outcomes.十年微创二尖瓣修复:长期疗效
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;88(4):1180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.023.
7
Minimally invasive valve surgery with antegrade perfusion strategy is not associated with increased neurologic complications.经顺行灌注策略的微创瓣膜手术与增加的神经系统并发症无关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1346-9; discussion 1349-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.055.
8
Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?经心尖主动脉瓣植入术真的比微创主动脉瓣置换术创伤更小吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;138(5):1067-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.057. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
9
Safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp.非体外循环下微创二尖瓣手术的安全性
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1544-9; discussion 1549-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.099.
10
Minimally invasive approaches to aortic valve surgery: Brigham experience.主动脉瓣手术的微创方法:布莱根妇女医院的经验。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Summer;18(2):148-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2006.07.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes: Minimally Invasive Thoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for Atrial Septal Defect Closure.短期结果比较:微创开胸术与正中开胸术治疗房间隔缺损的对比
Cureus. 2025 Jan 23;17(1):e77898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77898. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.超越传统手术:拥抱当代微创心脏手术时代。
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7210. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237210.
3
Interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral perioperative care model in cardiac surgery: implementation in the setting of minimally invasive heart valve surgery (INCREASE)-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
心脏外科围手术期多学科和跨部门护理模式:微创心脏瓣膜手术(INCREASE)中的实施-一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 23;23(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06455-x.
4
A Propensity Score Analysis of Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Retrograde Arterial Perfusion for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery in Both Young and Elderly Patients.青年和老年患者内镜及微创心脏瓣膜手术逆行动脉灌注早期和长期结局的倾向评分分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jan 28;9(2):44. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9020044.
5
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups.高危患者群体的微创主动脉瓣置换术。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):1672-1696. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.21.
6
What are the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in frail octogenarian patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?对于高龄体弱患者行主动脉瓣置换术,微创方法有哪些益处?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Sep;13(6):514-6. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.06.007.
7
Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options.主动脉瓣手术:微创选择
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):27-32. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-12-1-27.
8
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement - pros and cons of keyhole aortic surgery.微创主动脉瓣置换术——锁孔主动脉手术的利弊
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2015 Jun;12(2):103-10. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2015.52850. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Reoperative aortic valve replacement through upper hemisternotomy.经上半胸骨切开术再次行主动脉瓣置换术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):88-90. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.11.10.
10
Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve disease: a meta-analysis.二尖瓣疾病的前外侧小切口开胸术与正中胸骨切开术:一项荟萃分析。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2014 Jun;15(6):522-32. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300210.