• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用医疗保健服务:高危母亲的观点与经历

Using medical care: the views and experiences of high-risk mothers.

作者信息

Oakley A

机构信息

Social Science Research Unit, University of London.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1991 Dec;26(5):651-69.

PMID:1743973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1069847/
Abstract

Two recurrent unsolved problems of health services practice and policy in modern industrial countries are those of social class inequalities and user dissatisfaction. This article presents data related to these issues drawn from a sample of British childbearing women deemed "at risk" by health professionals. A third focus is on the relationship between past experiences of maternity care, and the patterns of service provision and perceptions of needs and satisfaction revealed in a subsequent pregnancy. Findings show a tendency for patterns of care to be differentiated by social class, with working class women generally receiving comparatively poor service. Satisfaction with general practitioner (community-based) prenatal care is higher than with hospital care. The more socially disadvantaged women in the sample are more likely to be dissatisfied with their medical care. The three major pregnancy needs highlighted by the sample women are for more continuity of care, more sympathetic medical care, and help with household finances. Adverse previous childbearing experiences are related to more dissatisfaction in the subsequent pregnancy.

摘要

现代工业国家卫生服务实践与政策中两个反复出现的未解决问题是社会阶层不平等和用户不满。本文呈现了与这些问题相关的数据,这些数据来自被卫生专业人员视为“有风险”的英国生育妇女样本。第三个重点是产前护理的过往经历与后续妊娠中所揭示的服务提供模式、需求认知及满意度之间的关系。研究结果显示,护理模式有因社会阶层而产生差异的趋势,工人阶级女性通常得到相对较差的服务。对全科医生(社区医疗)产前护理的满意度高于医院护理。样本中社会处境更不利的女性更有可能对其医疗护理不满。样本女性所强调的三大孕期需求是护理更具连续性、医疗护理更具同情心以及家庭财务方面的帮助。之前不良的生育经历与后续妊娠中更多的不满相关。

相似文献

1
Using medical care: the views and experiences of high-risk mothers.使用医疗保健服务:高危母亲的观点与经历
Health Serv Res. 1991 Dec;26(5):651-69.
2
Women's expectations and experiences of maternity care in NSW--what women highlight as most important.新南威尔士州女性对孕产护理的期望和体验——女性认为最重要的是什么。
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
3
Consumer responses to health care: women and maternity services.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11(4-5):147-55. doi: 10.1108/09526869810230803.
4
Pregnancy care of the low risk woman: the community-hospital interface.低风险孕妇的孕期护理:社区与医院的衔接
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(5):39-44. doi: 10.1108/09526869610125037.
5
Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care.孕妇对全科医生参与产科护理的看法。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):101-4.
6
Does general practitioner involvement in commissioning maternity care make a difference?全科医生参与产妇护理的委托工作会产生影响吗?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Apr;6(2):99-104. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927297.
7
[Pregnancy after 34 years: risks and evolution of risks].34岁之后怀孕:风险及风险演变
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1987 Sep;15(9):829-32.
8
What are pregnant women in a rural Niger Delta community's perceptions of conventional maternity service provision? An exploratory qualitative study.尼日尔三角洲农村社区的孕妇对传统产科服务提供的看法是什么?一项探索性定性研究。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2011 Sep;15(3):59-72.
9
A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland.一项关于苏格兰女性对其孕产护理看法的全国性调查。
Midwifery. 2000 Dec;16(4):303-13. doi: 10.1054/midw.2000.0231.
10
Dame Juliet Rhys Williams Memorial Lecture 1989. Safe motherhood.1989年朱丽叶·里斯·威廉姆斯女爵士纪念讲座。安全孕产。
Midwives Chron. 1990 Feb;103(1225):38-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review.高危妊娠中的幸福感:综合评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6.
2
A literature review on integrated perinatal care.关于围产期综合护理的文献综述。
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Jul 19;7:e28. doi: 10.5334/ijic.202.
3
Measuring satisfaction among low-income women: a prenatal care questionnaire.测量低收入女性的满意度:一份产前护理调查问卷。
Matern Child Health J. 1998 Mar;2(1):25-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1021841508698.
4
Prenatal care needs assessment comparing service use and outcomes in Fresno, CA.加利福尼亚州弗雷斯诺市产前护理需求评估:比较服务利用情况与结果
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):68-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's views and experiences of ante-natal care.
Practitioner. 1981 Feb;225(1352):123-5.
2
Benefits of a statewide high-risk perinatal program.
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Sep;62(3):294-6. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198309000-00005.
3
Perceived risk and choice of childbirth service.感知到的分娩服务风险与选择
Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(23):1857-65. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90162-4.
4
Provider continuity and quality of medical care. A retrospective analysis of prenatal and perinatal outcome.医疗服务提供者的连续性与医疗质量。产前及围产期结局的回顾性分析。
Med Care. 1983 Dec;21(12):1204-10. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198312000-00007.
5
Phenomenological risk-screening for childbirth: successful prospective differentiation of risk for medically low-risk mothers.分娩的现象学风险筛查:成功对医学低风险母亲的风险进行前瞻性区分。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1983 Sep-Oct;28(5):27-30. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(83)90136-2.
6
What is, must be best: a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision.存在即最好:关于产前护理提供中保守或顺从反应的研究笔记
Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(11):1197-200. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90370-8.
7
Psychosocial stress in pregnancy and its relation to low birth weight.孕期心理社会压力及其与低出生体重的关系。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Apr 21;288(6425):1191-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6425.1191.
8
The inverse care law.反向关怀法则
Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x.
9
A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight.一项关于助产士产前护理以降低低体重儿出生率的随机试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):341-5.
10
Physician role performance and patient satisfaction.医生角色表现与患者满意度。
Soc Sci Med (1967). 1976 Jan;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(76)90136-0.