Munson Kristofer, Clark Jarrod, Lamparska-Kupsik Katarzyna, Smith Steven S
City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, 1500 E. Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):2893-903. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm055. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
Many methods for the detection of genomic DNA methylation states have appeared. Currently, nearly all such methods employ bisulfite-mediated deamination of denatured DNA. While this treatment effectively deaminates cytosines to uracils, leaving most 5-methylcytosines intact, it also introduces abasic sites that generate a significant number of single-strand breaks in DNA. We have investigated the interplay of these two processes in order to determine their relative effects on the methylation-sensitive QPCR method. The extent of cleavage of the input DNA is significant and appears to be an increasing function of DNA concentration. Even so, the results suggest that only approximately 10% of a 62-nt target will be lost due to degradation and targets up to 131 nt will suffer only a 20% loss. More significant losses were found to occur during the subsequent removal of bisulfite and desulfonation steps that appear to be the result of size selectivity associated with matrix binding and elution required prior to QPCR in the most commonly used protocols. For biospecimens yielding <1 microg of DNA, these findings suggest that bisulfite treatment, in current implementations of MS-QPCR, result in low recoveries that preclude reliable analysis of DNA methylation patterns regardless of target size.
许多用于检测基因组DNA甲基化状态的方法已经出现。目前,几乎所有这些方法都采用亚硫酸氢盐介导的变性DNA脱氨作用。虽然这种处理有效地将胞嘧啶脱氨为尿嘧啶,而使大多数5-甲基胞嘧啶保持完整,但它也会引入无碱基位点,从而在DNA中产生大量单链断裂。我们研究了这两个过程之间的相互作用,以确定它们对甲基化敏感的定量PCR方法的相对影响。输入DNA的切割程度很显著,并且似乎是DNA浓度的递增函数。即便如此,结果表明,由于降解,一个62个核苷酸的靶标中只有约10%会丢失,而长达131个核苷酸的靶标只会损失20%。在随后去除亚硫酸氢盐和脱硫步骤的过程中发现了更显著的损失,这似乎是与最常用方案中定量PCR之前所需的基质结合和洗脱相关的大小选择性的结果。对于产生少于1微克DNA的生物样本,这些发现表明,在目前甲基化特异性定量PCR的实施方案中,亚硫酸氢盐处理导致回收率低,无论靶标大小如何,都无法对DNA甲基化模式进行可靠分析。