Osiri Manathip, Kamolratanakul Pirom, Maetzel Andreas, Tugwell Peter
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Rheumatol Int. 2007 Sep;27(11):1063-9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0342-5. Epub 2007 Apr 14.
The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of various DMARDs compared with antimalarials (AM) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. The data on disease activity, functional status and societal costs were collected from a 1-year cohort of 152 patients with RA receiving at least one DMARD for > or = 6 months. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated from the societal costs of DMARD treatment compared with AM per one unit of HAQ improvement. All costs were presented in 2001 US dollars. Mean (SD) societal cost of AM treatment was US$ 2,285 (1,154) per patient per year. MTX + AM was less costly and more effective than AM, as the ICER of this combination would save US$ 834 per 1 U of HAQ improvement. MTX + SSZ, leflunomide, and triple therapy (AM + MTX + SSZ) were more effective than AM with additional costs. RA treatment with non MTX-based DMARDs was not cost-effective.
目的是评估各种改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)与抗疟药(AM)相比用于类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗的成本效益。收集了152例接受至少一种DMARDs治疗≥6个月的RA患者1年队列中的疾病活动、功能状态和社会成本数据。通过将DMARDs治疗的社会成本与每改善1个健康评估问卷(HAQ)单位的抗疟药成本相比较,计算增量成本效益比(ICER)。所有成本均以2001年美元表示。抗疟药治疗的平均(标准差)社会成本为每位患者每年2285美元(1154美元)。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)+抗疟药比抗疟药成本更低且更有效,因为这种联合用药的ICER为每改善1个HAQ单位可节省834美元。MTX +柳氮磺胺吡啶(SSZ)、来氟米特和三联疗法(抗疟药+MTX+SSZ)比抗疟药更有效,但有额外成本。使用非MTX类DMARDs治疗RA不具有成本效益。