Levi Dennis M
School of Optometry and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020, USA.
Vision Res. 2007 Jun;47(13):1833-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
Humans with naturally occurring amblyopia show deficits thought to involve mechanisms downstream of V1. These include excessive crowding, abnormal global image processing, spatial sampling and symmetry detection and undercounting. Several recent studies suggest that humans with naturally occurring amblyopia show deficits in global image segregation. The current experiments were designed to study figure-ground segregation in amblyopic observers with documented deficits in crowding, symmetry detection, spatial sampling and counting, using similar stimuli. Observers had to discriminate the orientation of a figure (an "E"-like pattern made up of 17 horizontal Gabor patches), embedded in a 7x7 array of Gabor patches. When the 32 "background" patches are vertical, the "E" pops-out, due to segregation by orientation and performance is perfect; however, if the background patches are all, or mostly horizontal, the "E" is camouflaged, and performance is random. Using a method of constant stimuli, we varied the number of "background" patches that were vertical and measured the probability of correct discrimination of the global orientation of the E (up/down/left/right). Surprisingly, amblyopes who showed strong crowding and deficits in symmetry detection and counting, perform normally or very nearly so in this segregation task. I therefore conclude that these deficits are not a consequence of abnormal segregation of figure from background.
患有自然发生性弱视的人表现出的缺陷被认为涉及V1下游的机制。这些缺陷包括过度拥挤、异常的全局图像处理、空间采样和对称性检测以及计数不足。最近的几项研究表明,患有自然发生性弱视的人在全局图像分离方面存在缺陷。当前的实验旨在使用类似刺激,研究在拥挤、对称性检测、空间采样和计数方面有记录缺陷的弱视观察者的图形-背景分离。观察者必须辨别嵌入在7×7的Gabor斑块阵列中的一个图形(由17个水平Gabor斑块组成的类似“E”的图案)的方向。当32个“背景”斑块为垂直方向时,由于方向分离,“E”会突显出来,表现完美;然而,如果背景斑块全部或大部分为水平方向,“E”就会被伪装起来,表现为随机状态。我们使用恒定刺激法,改变垂直“背景”斑块的数量,并测量正确辨别“E”全局方向(上/下/左/右)的概率。令人惊讶的是,那些表现出强烈拥挤以及对称性检测和计数缺陷的弱视患者,在这项分离任务中的表现正常或非常接近正常。因此我得出结论,这些缺陷不是图形与背景异常分离的结果。