Reveiz L, Cardona A F, Ospina E G
Epidemiologist Sanitas Research Institute School of Medicine, Department of General Practice, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Diagonal 127 A # 31 - 48 Cons 221, Bogota, Colombia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD004783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004783.pub3.
Acute laryngitis is a common illness worldwide. Diagnosis is often made by case history alone and treatment is often directed towards controlling symptoms.
The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of different antibiotic therapies in adults suffering acute laryngitis. A secondary objective was to report the rates of adverse events associated with these treatments.
We systematically screened the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2006); MEDLINE (January 1966 to December Week 2 2006); and EMBASE (1974 to June 2006), LILACS (from 1982 to December 2006 ) and BIOSIS (1980 to June 2002). Other strategies included hand searching relevant journals, searching ongoing trial databases and general databases such as Google scholar.
Randomized controlled trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo in acute laryngitis. The main outcome measurement was objective voice scores.
Data were independently extracted by two review authors and then descriptively synthesized.
Only two trials met study inclusion criteria after extensive literature searches. One hundred participants were randomly selected to receive either penicillin V (800 mg twice a day for five days), or an identical placebo, in a study of penicillin V in acute laryngitis in adults. A tape recording of each patient reading a standardized text was obtained during the first visit, subsequently during re-examination after one and two weeks, and at follow up after two to six months. No significant differences were found between the groups. The trial also measured symptoms reported by participants and found no significant differences. The second trial investigated erythromycin for treating acute laryngitis in 106 adults. The mean objective voice scores measured at the first visit, at re-examination after one and two weeks, and at follow up after two to six months did not significantly differ between control and intervention groups. At one week there were significant beneficial differences in the severity of reported vocal symptoms as judged by the participants (P = 0.042). Comparing the erythromycin and placebo groups on subjective voice scores the a priori relative risk (RR) was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.96, P = 0.034) and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.5.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics appear to have no benefit in treating acute laryngitis. Erythromycin could reduce voice disturbance at one week and cough at two weeks when measured subjectively. We consider that these outcomes are not relevant in clinical practice. The implications for practice are that prescribing antibiotics should not be done in the first instance as they will not objectively improve symptoms.
急性喉炎是一种全球范围内的常见疾病。诊断通常仅依据病史做出,治疗往往旨在控制症状。
本综述的目的是评估不同抗生素疗法对患有急性喉炎的成年人的有效性。次要目的是报告与这些治疗相关的不良事件发生率。
我们系统地筛选了以下电子数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2006年第4期);医学索引数据库(1966年1月至2006年12月第2周);以及荷兰医学文摘数据库(1974年至2006年6月)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学数据库(1982年至2006年12月)和生物学文摘数据库(1980年至2002年6月)。其他检索策略包括手工检索相关期刊、检索正在进行的试验数据库以及诸如谷歌学术等通用数据库。
比较急性喉炎中任何抗生素疗法与安慰剂的随机对照试验。主要结局指标是客观嗓音评分。
数据由两位综述作者独立提取,然后进行描述性综合分析。
经过广泛的文献检索,仅有两项试验符合研究纳入标准。在一项针对成年人急性喉炎的青霉素V研究中,100名参与者被随机选择接受青霉素V(每日两次,每次800毫克,共五天)或相同的安慰剂。在首次就诊时、随后在一周和两周后的复查时以及两至六个月后的随访时,获取了每位患者朗读标准化文本的录音。两组之间未发现显著差异。该试验还测量了参与者报告的症状,也未发现显著差异。第二项试验研究了红霉素对106名成年人急性喉炎的治疗效果。在首次就诊时、一周和两周后的复查时以及两至六个月后的随访时所测量的平均客观嗓音评分,对照组和干预组之间没有显著差异。在一周时,参与者判断报告的嗓音症状严重程度存在显著的有益差异(P = 0.042)。比较红霉素组和安慰剂组的主观嗓音评分,先验相对危险度(RR)为0.7(9五%置信区间(CI)0.51至0.96,P = 0.034),需治疗人数(NNT)为4.5。
抗生素在治疗急性喉炎方面似乎没有益处。从主观测量来看,红霉素可在一周时减轻嗓音障碍,在两周时减轻咳嗽。我们认为这些结果在临床实践中并无实际意义。对临床实践的启示是,一开始不应开具抗生素,因为它们并不能客观地改善症状。