Suppr超能文献

提高研究招募率的策略。

Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies.

作者信息

Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I

机构信息

Castle Point and Rochford NHS Primary Care Trust, 12 Castle Road, Rayleigh, Essex, UK, SS6 7QF.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research studies are essential to improving healthcare. However, many fail to recruit their planned number of participants. There are many interventions that researchers try to improve recruitment. Finding which ones are effective would be of benefit to the research community and society.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effects of strategies to improve participation in research studies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We aimed to find all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. We searched nine electronic databases and manually searched the reference lists of relevant trials. We assessed the eligibility of each trial using pre-defined criteria.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of methods to increase recruitment in research studies. This includes non-healthcare studies. Studies that required only questionnaire completion were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on the method evaluated, nature of the population, nature of the study to be recruited into, randomisation or quasi-randomisation method, allocation concealment, numbers and proportions in each arm. We used risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals to describe the effects in individual trials, and assessed heterogeneity of these ratios between trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 eligible trials, including a total of 33,719 participants. All strategies were aimed at participants for healthcare studies. No strategies were identified at the level of researcher collaborators or ethics committees. Because of heterogeneity between trials and within strategies, the results were not synthesised. Trials of monetary incentives, an additional questionnaire at invitation and treatment information on the consent form demonstrated benefit; these specific interventions from individual trials are not easily generalizable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: On this evidence, it is not possible to predict the effect most interventions will have on recruitment. Funders and researchers should ensure that the evaluation of recruitment strategies are incorporated into research studies.

摘要

背景

研究对于改善医疗保健至关重要。然而,许多研究未能招募到计划数量的参与者。研究人员尝试了多种干预措施来改善招募情况。找出哪些措施有效将对研究界和社会有益。

目的

量化改善研究参与度策略的效果。

检索策略

我们旨在找到所有关于改善研究招募策略的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。我们检索了九个电子数据库,并手动检索了相关试验的参考文献列表。我们使用预定义标准评估每个试验的 eligibility。

选择标准

关于增加研究招募人数方法的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。这包括非医疗保健研究。仅要求完成问卷调查的研究被排除。

数据收集与分析

我们提取了关于所评估方法、人群性质、拟招募研究的性质、随机化或半随机化方法、分配隐藏、每组的数量和比例的数据。我们使用风险比及其 95% 置信区间来描述各个试验的效果,并评估试验之间这些比率的异质性。

主要结果

我们确定了 15 项 eligible 试验,共包括 33719 名参与者。所有策略均针对医疗保健研究的参与者。未在研究人员合作者或伦理委员会层面确定任何策略。由于试验之间以及策略内部存在异质性,因此未对结果进行综合分析。货币激励、邀请时额外的问卷以及同意书上的治疗信息试验显示出益处;这些来自个别试验的特定干预措施不易推广。

作者结论

基于此证据,无法预测大多数干预措施对招募的影响。资助者和研究人员应确保将招募策略的评估纳入研究之中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验