Devilly Grant J, Ciorciari Joseph, Piesse Amy, Sherwell Sarah, Zammit Sonia, Cook Fallon, Turton Christie
Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):212-7; discussion 218-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01875.x.
The current article presents two studies that aimed to replicate DePrince and Freyd's (2001, 2004) studies demonstrating that high and low dissociators differentially recall neutral and trauma words under conditions of varying cognitive load. We did not find this effect. This lack of replication was apparent for both free recall and word recognition memory and in both studies. In effect, we found little evidence to support betrayal trauma theory, yet observed increased memory fallibility, as demonstrated by lower general recall and (in one study) commission errors, in high dissociators.
本文呈现了两项研究,旨在重复德普林斯和弗雷德(2001年、2004年)的研究,这些研究表明,在不同认知负荷条件下,高解离者和低解离者对中性词和创伤词的回忆存在差异。我们并未发现这种效应。在两项研究中,无论是自由回忆还是单词识别记忆,这种缺乏重复效应的情况都很明显。实际上,我们几乎没有找到支持背叛创伤理论的证据,但观察到高解离者的记忆错误率增加,表现为总体回忆较低以及(在一项研究中)出现误判错误。