Schmitt J, Schmitt N, Meurer M
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Germany.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 May;21(5):606-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x.
To systematically assess the effectiveness of systemic cyclosporin in patients with severe atopic eczema.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials. Electronic (MEDLINE, Cochrane databases) and hand search of published work. Independent standardized assessment of eligibility and data abstraction by two reviewers.
For the qualitative review data on study design, study population, methodology, results, tolerability and methodological quality was independently extracted by two reviewers. Qualitatively homogeneous studies were pooled using a random-effects model. The mean relative change in objective disease severity was chosen as the main outcome measure for the quantitative analysis. Publication bias was explored by regressing treatment effect on sample size. Sensitivity analysis included meta-regression of study-specific covariates (inclusion of children, study type, concomitant topical therapy, study quality).
Fifteen studies including 602 patients met the eligibility criteria. In all studies analysed, cyclosporin consistently decreased the severity of atopic eczema. Twelve studies appeared homogeneous enough to be pooled. After 2 weeks of treatment we found a dose-related response with a pooled mean decrease in disease severity of 22% (95%-CI 8-36%) under low-dose cyclosporin ( 3 mg/kg) and 40% (95%-CI 29-51%) at dosages >or=4 mg/kg. After 6-8 weeks the relative effectiveness was 55% (95%-CI 48-62%).
Due to evidence of publication bias the quantitative results need to be interpreted with caution. Effectiveness of cyclosporin is similar in adults and children, but tolerability might be better in children. As data to adequately evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin in patients with atopic eczema are unavailable, long-term registries are encouraged.
系统评估全身性环孢素治疗重度特应性皮炎患者的疗效。
对对照试验和非对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。通过电子检索(MEDLINE、Cochrane数据库)和手工检索已发表的研究。由两名评价者独立进行标准化的纳入标准评估和数据提取。
对于定性评价,两名评价者独立提取关于研究设计、研究人群、方法、结果、耐受性和方法学质量的数据。采用随机效应模型对定性同质的研究进行合并。选择客观疾病严重程度的平均相对变化作为定量分析的主要结局指标。通过将治疗效果对样本量进行回归分析来探讨发表偏倚。敏感性分析包括对研究特定协变量(儿童纳入情况、研究类型、同时进行的局部治疗、研究质量)进行荟萃回归分析。
15项研究(共602例患者)符合纳入标准。在所有分析的研究中,环孢素均能持续降低特应性皮炎的严重程度。12项研究的同质性足以进行合并。治疗2周后,我们发现存在剂量相关反应,低剂量环孢素(3mg/kg)治疗下疾病严重程度的合并平均降低率为22%(95%可信区间8%-36%),剂量≥4mg/kg时为40%(95%可信区间29%-51%)。6-8周后的相对疗效为55%(95%可信区间48%-62%)。
由于存在发表偏倚的证据,定量结果的解释需谨慎。环孢素在成人和儿童中的疗效相似,但儿童的耐受性可能更好。由于缺乏充分评估环孢素治疗特应性皮炎患者长期疗效和安全性的数据,鼓励建立长期登记系统。