• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外中毒患者的分诊方法。

Triage method for out-of-hospital poisoned patients.

作者信息

Kwon Woon Yong, Rhee Joong Eui, Gang Hong Seong, Shin Sang Do, Cho Jun Hwi, Song Hyoung Gon, Suh Gil Joon

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Apr;22(2):336-41. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.336.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.336
PMID:17449946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2693604/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a triage method to prevent unnecessary emergency department visits of out-of-hospital poisoned patients. From October 2003 to September 2004, the calls that lay persons gave to the Seoul Emergency Medical Information Center to seek advice on the out-of-hospital poisoned patients were enrolled. We designed a triage protocol that consisted of five factors and applied it to the patients. According to the medical outcomes, we classified the patients into two groups, the toxicity-positive and the toxicity-negative. We arranged the factors on the basis of the priority that was determined in order of the odds ratio of each factor for the toxicity-positive and made a flow chart as a triage method. Then we calculated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the method. We regarded the specificity as the ability of the method and the sensitivity as the safety. A total of 220 patients were enrolled in this study. The method showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 99.2%, 53.4%, 76.2%, and 97.9%, respectively. Our triage method prevented 53.4% of the unnecessary emergency department visits of out-of-hospital acutely poisoned patients, safely.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发并评估一种分诊方法,以防止院外中毒患者不必要的急诊科就诊。2003年10月至2004年9月,纳入了非专业人员致电首尔紧急医疗信息中心咨询院外中毒患者的电话。我们设计了一个由五个因素组成的分诊方案,并将其应用于患者。根据医疗结果,我们将患者分为两组,即毒性阳性组和毒性阴性组。我们根据每个因素对毒性阳性的优势比确定的优先级来安排这些因素,并制作了一个流程图作为分诊方法。然后我们计算了该方法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。我们将特异度视为该方法的能力,将灵敏度视为安全性。本研究共纳入220例患者。该方法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为99.2%、53.4%、76.2%和97.9%。我们的分诊方法安全地防止了53.4%的院外急性中毒患者不必要的急诊科就诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7665/2693604/495512c70a1f/jkms-22-336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7665/2693604/a307bf50be45/jkms-22-336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7665/2693604/495512c70a1f/jkms-22-336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7665/2693604/a307bf50be45/jkms-22-336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7665/2693604/495512c70a1f/jkms-22-336-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Triage method for out-of-hospital poisoned patients.院外中毒患者的分诊方法。
J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Apr;22(2):336-41. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.336.
2
A comparison of emergency triage scales in triaging poisoned patients.中毒患者分诊中急诊分诊量表的比较。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Nov;17(4):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
3
Methylphenidate intoxications in children and adults: exposure circumstances and evidence-based dose threshold for pre-hospital triage.儿童和成人的哌甲酯中毒:院前分诊的暴露情况及循证剂量阈值
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Mar;53(3):168-77. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1004579. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Intentional drug poisoning care in a physician-manned emergency medical service.在有医生值守的紧急医疗服务中对故意药物中毒的护理。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):224-31. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.964890. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Feasibility of web-based self-triage by parents of children with influenza-like illness: a cautionary tale.基于网络的流感样疾病患儿家长自我分诊的可行性:一个警示故事。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Feb;167(2):112-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1573.
6
Comparison of urinary on-site immunoassay screening and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results of 111 patients with suspected poisoning presenting at an emergency department.111例急诊科疑似中毒患者尿液现场免疫分析筛查与气相色谱 - 质谱联用结果的比较
Ther Drug Monit. 2007 Feb;29(1):27-39. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31802bb2aa.
7
A Bayesian model for triage decision support.一种用于分诊决策支持的贝叶斯模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 May;75(5):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.028. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
8
Methylphenidate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.哌甲酯中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Oct-Nov;45(7):737-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665175.
9
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
10
Does telephone triage of emergency (999) calls using Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch (AMPDS) with Department of Health (DH) call prioritisation effectively identify patients with an acute coronary syndrome? An audit of 42,657 emergency calls to Hampshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust.使用高级医疗优先调度(AMPDS)并依据卫生部(DH)的呼叫优先级对紧急情况(999)电话进行分诊,能否有效识别出急性冠状动脉综合征患者?对汉普郡国民保健服务信托基金救护车服务的42657次紧急呼叫进行的一次审核。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Mar;23(3):232-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.022962.

本文引用的文献

1
2003 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System.美国毒物控制中心协会毒物暴露监测系统2003年年报。
Am J Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;22(5):335-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.06.001.
2
Compliance with poisons center referral advice and implications for toxicovigilance.遵循毒物中心转诊建议及其对药物警戒的影响。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(5):603-10. doi: 10.1081/clt-200026972.
3
Drug identification: a survey of poison control centers.药物识别:对中毒控制中心的一项调查。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(4):371-81. doi: 10.1081/clt-120039543.
4
Challenge and promise: the future of poison control services.挑战与前景:中毒控制服务的未来
Toxicology. 2004 May 20;198(1-3):285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.02.004.
5
Poison control services in China.中国的中毒控制服务。
Toxicology. 2004 May 20;198(1-3):279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.02.003.
6
New roles for poison control centres in the developing countries.发展中国家中毒控制中心的新作用。
Toxicology. 2004 May 20;198(1-3):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.02.002.
7
Epidemiologic characteristics of death by poisoning in 1991-2001 in Korea.1991 - 2001年韩国中毒死亡的流行病学特征。
J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Apr;19(2):186-94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.186.
8
Guideline for the out-of-hospital management of human exposures to minimally toxic substances.人类接触微毒物质的院外管理指南。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(7):907-17. doi: 10.1081/clt-120026510.
9
2002 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System.美国毒物控制中心协会毒物暴露监测系统2002年年报。
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;21(5):353-421. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(03)00088-3.
10
2001 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System.美国毒物控制中心协会毒物暴露监测系统2001年年报。
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Sep;20(5):391-452. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.34955.