Jung Chul-Woo, Kim Jin-Tae, Lee Kook-Hyun
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Apr;22(2):342-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.342.
Although levobupivacaine (LBUP) is less cardiotoxic than racemic bupivacaine (RBUP), the resuscitation from the LBUP-induced cardiovascular collapse (CVC) has not been easy as expected. Following the recent reports that proposed the resuscitative action of insulin for the RBUP-induced CVC, a controlled trial was performed to assess the feasibility of insulin for the LBUP-induced CVC. Fourteen dogs were randomly allocated into two groups: the RBUP and LBUP groups. Each group received continuous intravenous infusions of RBUP or LBUP until the mean arterial pressure (MAP) reached 40 mmHg. Then, an intravenous bolus of insulin (2 U/kg) was administered. Both groups were successfully resuscitated. At CVC, a decrease of cardiac output and an increase of systemic vascular resistance were observed but to a lesser degree in the LBUP group (p<0.05). After insulin injection, the MAP further declined to under 40 mmHg for several minutes, which was more protracted in the LBUP group (p<0.05). The CVCs induced by LBUP or RBUP in anesthetized dogs could be successfully resuscitated by insulin. Compared with RBUP, however, the less degree of vasoconstriction by LBUP and the innate vasodilatory property of insulin yielded a delayed increment of MAP during the immediate resuscitation period in the LBUP-induced CVC.
尽管左旋布比卡因(LBUP)的心脏毒性低于消旋布比卡因(RBUP),但从LBUP引起的心血管虚脱(CVC)中复苏并不像预期的那么容易。继最近有报道提出胰岛素对RBUP诱导的CVC有复苏作用之后,进行了一项对照试验,以评估胰岛素对LBUP诱导的CVC的可行性。14只犬被随机分为两组:RBUP组和LBUP组。每组持续静脉输注RBUP或LBUP,直到平均动脉压(MAP)达到40 mmHg。然后,静脉推注胰岛素(2 U/kg)。两组均成功复苏。在CVC时,观察到心输出量减少和全身血管阻力增加,但LBUP组程度较轻(p<0.05)。注射胰岛素后,MAP在几分钟内进一步降至40 mmHg以下,LBUP组持续时间更长(p<0.05)。胰岛素可成功复苏麻醉犬由LBUP或RBUP诱导的CVC。然而,与RBUP相比,LBUP引起的血管收缩程度较轻以及胰岛素固有的血管舒张特性导致LBUP诱导的CVC在即刻复苏期MAP的升高延迟。