• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及CHARITE腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的翻修及取出策略。

Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement.

作者信息

Leary Scott P, Regan John J, Lanman Todd H, Wagner Willis H

机构信息

Spine Center at Century City Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1001-11. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000260794.73938.93.

DOI:10.1097/01.brs.0000260794.73938.93
PMID:17450076
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A large case series of anterior revision surgery in patients who had complications following lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and discuss the etiology of implant-related complications and to present a strategy that can be applied to lumbar intervertebral disc prostheses in cases where anterior revision surgery is necessary.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

This report represents the largest single-site, consecutive case series reported in the literature of anterior revision surgery following lumbar disc arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 18 patients are included in this study. All patients required an anterior revision procedure for repositioning or removal of the prosthesis. The mean time to revision was 6 months (range, 9 days to 4 years).

RESULTS

In 17 of 20 cases, implant removal was required and the patient was converted to a fusion. In 3 cases, primary revision of the CHARITE artificial disc was performed. Six revision cases were performed within the early postoperative period, defined as 7 to 14 days. All early cases were approached via reexploration of the original anterior midline retroperitoneal incision. Late revision was required in 14 cases, ranging from 3 weeks to 4 years following initial arthroplasty. A variety of surgical approaches were used in late revisions, including the lateral transpsoas approach at L3-L4 or L4-L5 (n = 5), expanded ipsilateral left retroperitoneal approach at L4-L5 (n = 2), contralateral right retroperitoneal approach at L5-S1 (n = 6), and transperitoneal approach (n = 1). Following 20 consecutive, anterior revision procedures, implant revision was successfully achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Total disc replacement implant revisions occur largely as a result of technical errors in positioning and sizing of the implant. In addition, adherence to strict patient selection criteria will eliminate many cases of implant failure. When necessary, anterior revision surgery can be performed safely when a strategic approach is used.

摘要

研究设计

一项关于接受CHARITE人工椎间盘腰椎全椎间盘置换术后出现并发症患者的前路翻修手术的大型病例系列研究。

目的

分析并讨论植入物相关并发症的病因,并提出一种在前路翻修手术必要时可应用于腰椎间盘假体的策略。

背景资料总结

本报告是腰椎间盘置换术后前路翻修手术文献中报道的最大规模的单中心连续病例系列。

方法

本研究共纳入18例患者。所有患者均需要进行前路翻修手术以重新放置或取出假体。翻修的平均时间为6个月(范围为9天至4年)。

结果

20例中有17例需要取出植入物并转为融合手术。3例进行了CHARITE人工椎间盘的初次翻修。6例翻修手术在术后早期进行,定义为术后7至14天。所有早期病例均通过重新探查原前正中腹膜后切口进行处理。14例需要进行晚期翻修,时间为初次置换术后3周 至4年。晚期翻修采用了多种手术入路,包括L3-L4或L4-L5节段的经腰大肌外侧入路(n = 5)、L4-L5节段的扩大同侧左腹膜后入路(n = 2)、L5-S1节段的对侧右腹膜后入路(n = 6)以及经腹入路(n = 1)。经过连续20例前路翻修手术后,所有病例均成功完成了植入物翻修。

结论

全椎间盘置换植入物翻修主要是由于植入物定位和尺寸的技术错误导致的。此外,严格遵守患者选择标准可消除许多植入物失败的病例。必要时,采用策略性方法可安全地进行前路翻修手术。

相似文献

1
Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement.涉及CHARITE腰椎人工椎间盘置换术的翻修及取出策略。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1001-11. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000260794.73938.93.
2
Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.Charité腰椎人工椎间盘置换翻修或取出的入路策略。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;44(6):1266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.046.
3
Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique.Charité腰椎人工椎间盘假体取出术:手术技术
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jul;22(5):334-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181761d0c.
4
Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.腰椎全椎间盘置换术的翻修策略。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1276-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181714a1d.
5
Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.腰椎ProDisc II假体植入后获得性椎弓根峡部裂:病例报告及文献复习
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):E645-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573ccc.
6
Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.全腰椎间盘置换术:不同节段的不同结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):782-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259071.64027.04.
7
Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures.脊柱手术的翻修开放性前路入路
Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.015. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
8
Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.两级Maverick椎间盘置换与一级混合椎间盘置换及一级前路腰椎椎间融合术的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 May 28.
9
Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.金属对金属人工腰椎间盘置换的前瞻性随机试验:治疗椎间盘源性疼痛的初步结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):123-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816043af.
10
[Total lumbar disc replacement with SB Charité III prosthesis: Chinese experience with more than two years follow-up].使用SB Charité III型假体进行全腰椎间盘置换术:中国超过两年随访经验
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):342-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Index-Level and Adjacent-Level Revision Surgery Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes.单节段全椎间盘置换术:索引节段及相邻节段翻修手术的发生率、特征及结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jul 25;16(5):847-58. doi: 10.14444/8331.
2
Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in a consecutive series of 72 patients.72 例连续患者行极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2021 Oct 1;21(5):587-597. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2020.5261.
3
Revision surgery of spinal dynamic implants: a literature review and algorithm proposal.
脊柱动力植入物翻修手术:文献回顾与算法建议
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(Suppl 1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06282-w. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.我们需要谈谈腰椎全椎间盘置换术。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):201-240. doi: 10.14444/5029. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.成人脊柱畸形微创手术的局限性与并发症
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):109. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.01.29.
6
Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device.采用微创外侧入路进行腰椎全椎间盘置换术:美国XL TDR® 装置IDE临床试验中两个中心的结果报告
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3843-z. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
7
ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.国际脊柱侧弯研究学会政策声明 - 腰椎人工椎间盘
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 12;9:7. doi: 10.14444/2007. eCollection 2015.
8
Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.腰椎全椎间盘置换的适应证:为合适的全椎间盘选择具有合适适应证的合适患者。
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1012. eCollection 2014.
9
Multilevel extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and osteotomies for 3-dimensional severe deformity: 25 consecutive cases.用于三维严重畸形的多级极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)及截骨术:25例连续病例
Int J Spine Surg. 2013 Dec 1;7:e8-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.10.001. eCollection 2013.
10
Outcome of salvage lumbar fusion after lumbar arthroplasty.腰椎置换术后挽救性腰椎融合术的结果
Asian Spine J. 2014 Feb;8(1):13-8. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.1.13. Epub 2014 Feb 6.