Krishna Naveen B, Saripalli Saradhi, Safdar Rizwan, Agarwal Banke
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.020. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
The clinical utility of intraductal US (IDUS) for evaluating biliary strictures has been limited because of a lack of easily recognized morphologic criteria to distinguish benign and malignant strictures. We studied the clinical value of 2 easily assessed IDUS findings: wall thickness and extrinsic compression at the stricture site.
A retrospective, single-center study.
Forty-five patients without an identifiable mass on CT/magnetic resonance imaging, who underwent ERCP/IDUS for evaluation of biliary strictures were studied. IDUS pictures were reviewed specifically to measure wall thickness and to look for extrinsic compression at the stricture site.
The mean age of the patients was 64.2+/-13.3 years. Thirty patients had jaundice at presentation, and in 15 patients a stricture was suspected on imaging. The mean length of biliary strictures was 15.1+/-7.8 mm. Strictures were distal (distal common bile duct) in 25 patients and proximal (mid/proximal common bile duct or common hepatic duct) in 20 patients. Fourteen strictures were finally diagnosed to be malignant. Strictures in 20 patients were caused by extrinsic compression, and tissue diagnosis was readily obtained by EUS-FNA in all these patients. Of 25 strictures without extrinsic compression, 6 were malignant (wall thickness 9-16 mm) and 19 were benign (wall thickness<or=9 mm). Bile duct wall thickness<or=7 mm at the stricture site, in the absence of extrinsic compression, had a negative predictive value of 100% for excluding malignancy in this cohort.
Retrospective study and relatively small number of patients.
Evaluation of wall thickness and the presence of extrinsic compression at the site of biliary strictures by IDUS can help in further management of these patients.
由于缺乏易于识别的形态学标准来区分良性和恶性胆管狭窄,胆管内超声(IDUS)在评估胆管狭窄方面的临床应用受到限制。我们研究了两种易于评估的IDUS表现的临床价值:管壁厚度和狭窄部位的外在压迫。
一项回顾性单中心研究。
对45例在CT/磁共振成像上未发现明确肿块、因评估胆管狭窄而接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)/IDUS检查的患者进行研究。专门回顾IDUS图像以测量管壁厚度,并寻找狭窄部位的外在压迫。
患者的平均年龄为64.2±13.3岁。30例患者就诊时出现黄疸,15例患者在影像学检查中怀疑有狭窄。胆管狭窄的平均长度为15.1±7.8mm。25例患者的狭窄位于远端(胆总管远端),20例患者的狭窄位于近端(胆总管中/近端或肝总管)。最终诊断出14例狭窄为恶性。20例患者的狭窄是由外在压迫引起的,所有这些患者均通过内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)轻松获得组织诊断。在25例无外在压迫的狭窄中,6例为恶性(管壁厚度9-16mm),19例为良性(管壁厚度≤9mm)。在本队列中,狭窄部位胆管壁厚度≤7mm且无外在压迫时,排除恶性肿瘤的阴性预测值为100%。
回顾性研究且患者数量相对较少。
通过IDUS评估胆管狭窄部位的管壁厚度和是否存在外在压迫有助于对这些患者进行进一步管理。