• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用行政数据或临床数据库作为医院死亡风险的预测指标:模型比较

Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models.

作者信息

Aylin Paul, Bottle Alex, Majeed Azeem

机构信息

Dr Foster Unit, Imperial College London, London EC1A 9LA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.496366.55. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.39168.496366.55
PMID:17452389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1871739/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare risk prediction models for death in hospital based on an administrative database with published results based on data derived from three national clinical databases: the national cardiac surgical database, the national vascular database and the colorectal cancer study.

DESIGN

Analysis of inpatient hospital episode statistics. Predictive model developed using multiple logistic regression.

SETTING

NHS hospital trusts in England.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted to an NHS hospital within England for isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and colorectal excision for cancer from 1996-7 to 2003-4.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Deaths in hospital. Performance of models assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve scores measuring discrimination (<0.7=poor, 0.7-0.8=reasonable, >0.8=good) and both Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and standardised residuals measuring goodness of fit.

RESULTS

During the study period 152 523 cases of isolated CABG with 3247 deaths in hospital (2.1%), 12 781 repairs of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (5987 deaths, 46.8%), 31 705 repairs of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (3246 deaths, 10.2%), and 144,370 colorectal resections for cancer (10,424 deaths, 7.2%) were recorded. The power of the complex predictive model was comparable with that of models based on clinical datasets with ROC curve scores of 0.77 (v 0.78 from clinical database) for isolated CABG, 0.66 (v 0.65) and 0.74 (v 0.70) for repairs of ruptured and unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, respectively, and 0.80 (v 0.78) for colorectal excision for cancer. Calibration plots generally showed good agreement between observed and predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinely collected administrative data can be used to predict risk with similar discrimination to clinical databases. The creative use of such data to adjust for case mix would be useful for monitoring healthcare performance and could usefully complement clinical databases. Further work on other procedures and diagnoses could result in a suite of models for performance adjusted for case mix for a range of specialties and procedures.

摘要

目的

基于管理数据库比较医院死亡风险预测模型与基于三个国家临床数据库(国家心脏外科数据库、国家血管数据库和结直肠癌研究)数据发表的结果。

设计

对住院患者医院事件统计数据进行分析。使用多重逻辑回归开发预测模型。

设置

英格兰的国民健康服务(NHS)医院信托机构。

患者

1996 - 1997年至2003 - 2004年期间在英格兰因单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、腹主动脉瘤修复术以及癌症结直肠切除术而入住NHS医院的所有患者。

主要观察指标

医院死亡情况。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评分评估模型的性能,该评分用于衡量区分度(<0.7 = 差,0.7 - 0.8 = 合理,>0.8 = 良好),同时使用Hosmer - Lemeshow统计量和标准化残差评估拟合优度。

结果

在研究期间,记录了152523例单纯CABG病例,其中3247例在医院死亡(2.1%);12781例腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术(5987例死亡,46.8%);31705例腹主动脉瘤未破裂修复术(3246例死亡,10.2%);以及144370例癌症结直肠切除术(10424例死亡,7.2%)。复杂预测模型的效能与基于临床数据集的模型相当,单纯CABG的ROC曲线评分为0.77(临床数据库为0.78),腹主动脉瘤破裂和未破裂修复术的ROC曲线评分分别为0.66(临床数据库为0.65)和0.74(临床数据库为0.70),癌症结直肠切除术的ROC曲线评分为0.80(临床数据库为0.78)。校准图总体显示观察到的死亡率与预测死亡率之间具有良好的一致性。

结论

常规收集的管理数据可用于预测风险,其区分度与临床数据库相似。创造性地利用此类数据调整病例组合,将有助于监测医疗保健绩效,并可有效补充临床数据库。针对其他手术和诊断的进一步研究可能会产生一套针对一系列专科和手术的病例组合调整性能模型。

相似文献

1
Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models.使用行政数据或临床数据库作为医院死亡风险的预测指标:模型比较
BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.496366.55. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
2
Derivation and validation of a practical risk score for prediction of mortality after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in a US regional cohort and comparison to existing scoring systems.基于美国区域性队列的破裂性腹主动脉瘤开放修复术后死亡率预测的实用风险评分的推导和验证,并与现有评分系统进行比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.120. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
3
A comparison of administrative data and quality improvement registries for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.行政数据与腹主动脉瘤修复质量改进登记的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):874-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.105. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
National risk prediction model for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的国家风险预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2013 Apr;100(5):645-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9047. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
5
External validation of Vascular Study Group of New England risk predictive model of mortality after elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative and comparison against established models.血管研究组新英格兰风险预测模型在外科学会血管质量倡议中的择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后死亡率的外部验证,并与现有模型进行比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.087. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
6
Not all risk scores are created equal: A comparison of risk scores for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in administrative data and quality improvement registries.并非所有风险评分都是同等创建的:行政数据和质量改进登记处中用于腹主动脉瘤修复的风险评分比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1874-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.110. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
7
A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: Have we improved outcomes equally between men and women?美国腹主动脉瘤修复十年变迁:我们是否在同等程度上改善了男性和女性的治疗效果?
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):230-8; discussion 238. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.043.
8
Modern mortality risk stratification scores accurately and equally predict real-world postoperative mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.现代死亡率风险分层评分准确且平等地预测了破裂性腹主动脉瘤的真实术后死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):1048-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.058. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Comparison of three contemporary risk scores for mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后三种当代死亡率风险评分的比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;48(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.03.040. Epub 2014 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A nationwide analysis.心房颤动对接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的住院患者的影响:一项全国性分析。
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):105053. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.105053.
2
Predictors of 30-day readmission among those treated with alcohol withdrawal in acute hospitals in England.英格兰急性医院中接受酒精戒断治疗患者30天再入院的预测因素。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 Mar 25;60(3). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf022.
3
Incidence and risk factors for early thyroxin supplementation therapy after hemithyroidectomy for benign conditions in Europe. A Eurocrine® registry-based study.欧洲良性疾病甲状腺半切术后早期补充甲状腺素治疗的发生率及危险因素。一项基于Eurocrine®注册研究。
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02220-2.
4
Development and Application of New Risk-Adjustment Models to Improve the Current Model for Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio in South Korea.韩国新型风险调整模型的开发与应用,以改进当前医院标准化死亡率模型
Yonsei Med J. 2025 Mar;66(3):179-186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0545.
5
Sex-Associated Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Septal Reduction Therapies in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.肥厚型心肌病间隔减少治疗后临床结局的性别差异
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Dec;99(12):1933-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.05.026. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
6
COVID-19 inpatient care performance in the unified health system, São Paulo state, Brazil: an application of standardized mortality ratio for hospitals' comparisons : COVID-19 inpatient care performance in SUS, Brazil.巴西圣保罗州统一卫生系统中 COVID-19 住院患者护理绩效的评估:应用标准化死亡率对医院进行比较:巴西 SUS 中的 COVID-19 住院患者护理绩效。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11496-w.
7
[Hospital standardized mortality ratio: limits and potential of the indicator for assessing hospital performance in the Brazilian Unified National Health System].[医院标准化死亡率:巴西统一国家卫生系统中评估医院绩效指标的局限性与潜力]
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 26;40(2):e00080723. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT080723. eCollection 2024.
8
External Validation and Recalibration of a Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Ischaemic Stroke.缺血性中风患者死亡率预测模型的外部验证与重新校准
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 18;12(22):7168. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227168.
9
Which comorbidity index is more appropriate for geriatric patients from the frailty perspective?从衰弱的角度来看,哪种合并症指数更适合老年患者?
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Feb;15(1):115-125. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00851-5. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
10
Comparison of Administrative Database-Derived and Hospital-Derived Data for Monitoring Blood Culture Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.比较行政数据库和医院数据在监测儿科重症监护病房血液培养使用中的应用。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):436-442. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piad048.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive study comparing routine hospital administrative data with the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland's National Vascular Database.一项描述性研究,比较医院常规管理数据与大不列颠及爱尔兰血管外科学会的国家血管数据库。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):461-5; discussion 466. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.10.033. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
2
ICD-10-CA/CCI coding algorithms for defining clinical variables to assess outcome after aortic and mitral valve replacement surgery.用于定义临床变量以评估主动脉和二尖瓣置换手术后结局的ICD-10-CA/CCI编码算法。
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Feb;22(2):153-4. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70256-2.
3
Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment.常规数据库在卫生技术评估中的潜在应用。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(20):1-92, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9200.
4
Surgery for congenital heart conditions in Oxford.牛津的先天性心脏病手术
BMJ. 2005 Feb 12;330(7487):319-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7487.319.
5
Mortality after noncardiac surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data.非心脏手术后的死亡率:基于管理数据与临床数据的预测
Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):159-67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00009.
6
Mortality after cardiac bypass surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data.心脏搭桥手术后的死亡率:基于管理数据与临床数据的预测
Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):149-58. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00008.
7
New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.新版国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的查尔森合并症指数可预测住院死亡率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012.
8
Cross sectional survey of multicentre clinical databases in the United Kingdom.英国多中心临床数据库的横断面调查。
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1478.
9
Payment by results--new financial flows in the NHS.按绩效付费——英国国家医疗服务体系中的新资金流动方式
BMJ. 2004 Apr 24;328(7446):969-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.969.
10
Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study.结直肠癌手术死亡率:全国前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1196-201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1196.