Donaldson Meghan G, Sobolev Boris, Kuramoto Lisa, Cook Wendy L, Khan Karim M, Janssen Patti A
Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Apr;62(4):415-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.4.415.
Falls are the most common cause of injury among elderly people; half of those people fall recurrently. The objective of these simulation studies was to describe the Mean Cumulative Function (MCF) and to evaluate the utility of the MCF in detecting differences between groups experiencing different patterns of event intensities.
We specified 250 participants per group with a maximum follow-up time of 365 days. A participant could experience 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 falls. In the baseline experiment, Groups A and B had an average intensity of 60 and 90 days to the first fall event. These event intensities remained constant for events 2-4. Group C represents a short term "strong" initial impact of the intervention modeled for falls 1 and 2, with an average intensity of one fall per 117 days; however, the intervention wanes to "moderate" for falls 3 and 4 with an average intensity of one fall per 90 days. Group D represents a long-term "strong" impact of the intervention modeled by an average intensity of one fall per 117 days for all subsequent events.
The MCF was able to detect differences between groups that had varying intensities of subsequent falls. In Group A, all participants experienced at least one fall, whereas Groups B, C, and D had 4, 9, and 15 participants, respectively, who did not experience any falls. The proportion of participants who had 4 falls declined from 84% to 40% in Groups A and D, respectively. When Group A was compared to Group D, the MCF difference detected the prevention of, on average, one fall per person within 175 days. Discussion. A novel instrument for this field of clinical research--the MCF--allows investigators to compare the average number of falls per participant when the intervention reduces the intensity of subsequent falls.
跌倒是老年人受伤的最常见原因;其中一半的人会反复跌倒。这些模拟研究的目的是描述平均累积函数(MCF),并评估MCF在检测经历不同事件强度模式的组间差异方面的效用。
我们规定每组有250名参与者,最长随访时间为365天。一名参与者可能经历0次、1次、2次、3次或4次跌倒。在基线实验中,A组和B组首次跌倒事件的平均强度分别为60天和90天。这些事件强度在第2 - 4次事件中保持不变。C组代表针对第1次和第2次跌倒建模的干预措施的短期“强烈”初始影响,平均强度为每117天发生一次跌倒;然而,对于第3次和第4次跌倒,干预措施减弱为“中等”强度,平均强度为每90天发生一次跌倒。D组代表干预措施的长期“强烈”影响,所有后续事件的平均强度为每117天发生一次跌倒。
MCF能够检测出后续跌倒强度不同的组间差异。在A组中,所有参与者至少经历了一次跌倒,而B组、C组和D组分别有4名、9名和15名参与者未经历任何跌倒。在A组和D组中,经历4次跌倒的参与者比例分别从84%降至40%。当将A组与D组进行比较时,MCF差异检测到平均在175天内每人预防了一次跌倒。讨论。临床研究领域的一种新型工具——MCF——使研究人员能够在干预降低后续跌倒强度时比较每位参与者的平均跌倒次数。