Suppr超能文献

主动脉后左肾静脉:多层螺旋计算机断层血管造影表现及其临床意义。

Retroaortic left renal vein: multidetector computed tomography angiography findings and its clinical importance.

作者信息

Karaman B, Koplay M, Ozturk E, Basekim C C, Ogul H, Mutlu H, Kizilkaya E, Kantarci M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sivas Military Hospital, Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2007 Apr;48(3):355-60. doi: 10.1080/02841850701244755.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the appearance, type, frequency, and clinical importance of retroaortic left renal vein (RLRV) in patients examined with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1856 patients who underwent CT with urological symptoms (hematuria, flank and abdominal pain, left gonadal vein varicocele) (n = 889) or with symptoms other than urological ones (n = 967) were prospectively evaluated for the presence of RLRV. CT was performed with 110 ml of iodinated contrast material through the antecubital vein at a rate of 3.5 ml/s. Late arterial and early venous phase volumetric data sets were acquired at 30 and 65 s, respectively, from the start of the intravenous injection of contrast medium. In addition to axial images, multiplanar reconstructions (MPR), maximum-intensity projection (MIP), and three-dimensional volume-rendering (3D VR) images were used to assess left renal vein anomalies. Left renal vein anomalies were classified into four types according to their appearance: I) RLRV joining the inferior vena cava (IVC) in the orthotopic position; II) RLRV joining the IVC at level L4-L5; III) circumaortic or collar left renal vein; IV) RLRV joining the left common iliac vein.

RESULTS

RLRV was detected in 68 (3.6%) of the 1856 patients, with 26, 22, 17, and three of types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Forty-four of the 68 patients with RLRV (65%) were in the group with urological symptoms, while 24 patients (35%) were in the group without urological symptoms. Compression of the RLRV was found in 16 patients in the urological symptoms group, while compression was detected in only three patients in the other group. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The most common urological symptom was hematuria. The frequency of urological symptoms was higher in groups II and IV compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

MDCT angiography with axial, MPR, MIP, and 3D VR images is effective in the detection of vascular renal anomalies such as RLRV. Diagnosing RLRV and differentiating it from other pathologic conditions causing hematuria is important in order to avoid complications during retroperitoneal surgery or interventional procedures.

摘要

目的

通过多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)血管造影检查,评估主动脉后左肾静脉(RLRV)的表现、类型、发生率及临床意义。

材料与方法

前瞻性评估1856例因泌尿系统症状(血尿、胁腹及腹痛、左侧精索静脉曲张)(n = 889)或非泌尿系统症状(n = 967)接受CT检查的患者是否存在RLRV。经肘前静脉以3.5 ml/s的速率注入110 ml碘化造影剂进行CT检查。分别在静脉注射造影剂开始后30 s和65 s采集动脉晚期和静脉早期容积数据集。除轴位图像外,还使用多平面重建(MPR)、最大密度投影(MIP)和三维容积再现(3D VR)图像评估左肾静脉异常。根据左肾静脉异常的表现将其分为四种类型:I)原位RLRV汇入下腔静脉(IVC);II)RLRV在L4 - L5水平汇入IVC;III)主动脉周围或环状左肾静脉;IV)RLRV汇入左髂总静脉。

结果

1856例患者中68例(3.6%)检测到RLRV,其中I、II、III、IV型分别为26例、22例、17例和3例。68例RLRV患者中44例(65%)属于泌尿系统症状组,24例(35%)属于非泌尿系统症状组。泌尿系统症状组16例患者发现RLRV受压,而另一组仅3例患者检测到受压。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。最常见的泌尿系统症状是血尿。II型和IV型组的泌尿系统症状发生率高于其他组。

结论

采用轴位、MPR、MIP和3D VR图像的MDCT血管造影对检测RLRV等肾血管异常有效。诊断RLRV并将其与其他导致血尿的病理状况区分开来,对于避免腹膜后手术或介入操作期间的并发症很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验