Martikainen Pekka, Laaksonen Mikko, Piha Kustaa, Lallukka Tea
Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212-5. doi: 10.1080/14034940600996563.
A non-response rate of 20-40%is typical in questionnaire studies. The authors evaluate non-response bias and its impact on analyses of social class inequalities in health.
Set in the context of a health survey carried out among the employees of the City of Helsinki (non-response 33%) in 2000-02. Survey response and non-response records were linked with a personnel register to provide information on occupational social class and long sickness absence spells as an indicator of health status.
Women and employees in higher occupational social classes were more likely to respond. Non-respondents had about 20-30% higher sickness absence rates. Relative social class differences in sickness absence in the total population were similar to those among either respondents or non-respondents.
In working populations survey non-response does not seriously bias analyses of social class inequalities in sickness absence and possibly health inequalities more generally.
问卷调查研究中20%-40%的无应答率很常见。作者评估了无应答偏差及其对健康方面社会阶层不平等分析的影响。
以2000年至2002年在赫尔辛基市雇员中开展的一项健康调查为背景(无应答率为33%)。调查应答和无应答记录与人事登记册相链接,以提供职业社会阶层信息以及作为健康状况指标的长期病假情况。
女性和职业社会阶层较高的雇员应答的可能性更大。无应答者的病假率高出约20%-30%。总体人群中病假方面的相对社会阶层差异与应答者或无应答者中的差异相似。
在工作人群调查中,无应答不会严重影响对病假方面社会阶层不平等分析,可能更普遍地也不会严重影响对健康不平等的分析。