Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Aug 11;77(8):1478-1489. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac075.
Childhood socioeconomic disadvantage is consistently associated with lower cognitive function in later life. This study aims to distinguish the contribution of specific aspects of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage for memory performance in mid to late adulthood, with consideration for direct and indirect effects through education and occupation.
Data were from adults aged 50 to 80 years who completed the life history module in the 2006/2007 wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 4,553). The outcome, memory score, was based on word recall tests (range: 0-20 points). We used the g-formula to estimate direct and indirect effects of a composite variable for childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and its 4 individual components: lower-skilled occupation of the primary breadwinner, having few books in the home, overcrowding in the home, and lack of water and heating facilities in the home.
Few books were the most consequential component of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage for later-life memory (total effect: -0.82 points for few books; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.04, -0.60), with roughly half being a direct effect. The total effect of a breadwinner in lower-skilled occupations was smaller but not significantly different from a few books (-0.67 points; 95% CI: -0.88, -0.46), while it was significantly smaller with overcrowding (-0.31 points; 95% CI: -0.56, -0.06). The latter 2 total effects were mostly mediated by education and occupation.
A literate environment in the childhood home may have lasting direct effects on memory function in mid to later life, while parental occupation and overcrowding appear to influence memory primarily through educational and occupational pathways.
童年时期的社会经济劣势与晚年较低的认知功能密切相关。本研究旨在区分童年时期社会经济劣势的特定方面对中年至晚年记忆力的贡献,同时考虑通过教育和职业产生的直接和间接影响。
数据来自于年龄在 50 至 80 岁之间的成年人,他们完成了 2006/2007 年英国老龄化纵向研究的生活史模块(n=4553)。结果,记忆评分基于单词回忆测试(范围:0-20 分)。我们使用 g 公式来估计童年社会经济劣势及其 4 个个体成分的综合变量对晚年记忆的直接和间接影响:主要养家糊口者的低技能职业、家中书籍较少、家庭拥挤以及家中缺乏水和暖气设施。
家中书籍较少是童年社会经济劣势对晚年记忆最重要的影响因素(总效应:书籍较少的分数为-0.82 分;95%置信区间[CI]:-1.04,-0.60),大约一半是直接影响。从事低技能职业的养家糊口者的总效应虽然较小,但与书籍较少的情况没有显著差异(-0.67 分;95%CI:-0.88,-0.46),而家庭拥挤的情况则显著较小(-0.31 分;95%CI:-0.56,-0.06)。后两个总效应主要通过教育和职业来介导。
童年时期家庭中的文化环境可能对中年至晚年的记忆功能产生持久的直接影响,而父母的职业和家庭拥挤程度似乎主要通过教育和职业途径影响记忆。