Anavekar Nagesh S, Gerson David, Skali Hicham, Kwong Raymond Y, Yucel E Kent, Solomon Scott D
Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Unit, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Echocardiography. 2007 May;24(5):452-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00424.x.
While echocardiography is used most frequently to assess right ventricular (RV) function in clinical practice, echocardiography is limited in its ability to provide an accurate measure of RV ejection fraction (RVEF). Hence, quantitative estimation of RV function has proven difficult in clinical practice.
We sought to determine which commonly used echocardiographic measures of RV function were most accurate in comparison with an MRI-derived estimate of RVEF.
We analyzed RV function in 36 patients who had cardiac MRI studies and echocardiograms within a 24 hour period. 2D parameters of RV function-right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC), tricuspid annular motion (TAM), and transverse fractional shortening (TFS) were obtained from the four-chamber view. RV volumes and EFs were derived from volumetric reconstruction based on endocardial tracing of the RV chamber from the short axis images. Echocardiographic assessment of RV function was correlated with MRI findings.
RVFAC measured by echocardiography correlated best with MRI-derived RVEF (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). Neither TAM (r = 0.17; P = 0.30) nor TFC (r = 0.12; p< 0.38) were significantly correlated with RVEF.
RVFAC is the best of commonly utilized echocardiographic 2D measure of RV function and correlated best with MRI-derived RV ejection fraction.
While echocardiography is used most frequently to assess RV function in clinical practice, echocardiography is limited in its ability to provide an accurate measure of RV ejection fraction (RVEF). Using cardiac MRI, RV fractional area change (RVFAC), determined either by MRI or echocardiography, was found to correlate best with MRI-derived RVEF.
虽然在临床实践中超声心动图最常用于评估右心室(RV)功能,但超声心动图在准确测量右心室射血分数(RVEF)方面能力有限。因此,在临床实践中,右心室功能的定量评估已被证明具有难度。
我们试图确定与心脏磁共振成像(MRI)得出的右心室射血分数估计值相比,哪些常用的右心室功能超声心动图测量方法最为准确。
我们分析了36例在24小时内进行了心脏MRI检查和超声心动图检查的患者的右心室功能。从四腔心切面获取右心室功能的二维参数——右心室面积变化分数(RVFAC)、三尖瓣环运动(TAM)和横向缩短分数(TFS)。右心室容积和射血分数通过基于短轴图像上右心室腔心内膜追踪的容积重建得出。右心室功能的超声心动图评估与MRI结果相关。
超声心动图测量的RVFAC与MRI得出的RVEF相关性最佳(r = 0.80,P < 0.001)。TAM(r = 0.17;P = 0.30)和TFC(r = 0.12;P = 0.38)与RVEF均无显著相关性。
RVFAC是常用的右心室功能二维超声心动图测量方法中最佳的,且与MRI得出的右心室射血分数相关性最佳。
虽然在临床实践中超声心动图最常用于评估右心室功能,但超声心动图在准确测量右心室射血分数(RVEF)方面能力有限。通过心脏MRI发现,无论是通过MRI还是超声心动图确定的右心室面积变化分数(RVFAC)与MRI得出的RVEF相关性最佳。