Waser M, Michels K B, Bieli C, Flöistrup H, Pershagen G, von Mutius E, Ege M, Riedler J, Schram-Bijkerk D, Brunekreef B, van Hage M, Lauener R, Braun-Fahrländer C
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 May;37(5):661-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02640.x.
Dietary interventions as a means for atopy prevention attract great interest. Some studies in rural environments claimed an inverse association between consumption of farm-produced dairy products and the prevalence of allergic diseases, but current evidence is controversial.
To investigate whether consumption of farm-produced products is associated with a lower prevalence of asthma and allergy when compared with shop-purchased products.
Cross sectional multi-centre study (PARSIFAL) including 14,893 children aged 5-13 years from five European countries (2823 from farm families and 4606 attending Steiner Schools as well as 5440 farm reference and 2024 Steiner reference children). A detailed questionnaire including a dietary component was completed and allergen-specific IgE was measured in serum.
Farm milk consumption ever in life showed a statistically significant inverse association with asthma: covariate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.88], rhinoconjunctivitis: aOR 0.56 (0.43-0.73) and sensitization to pollen and the food mix fx5 (cut-off level of >or=3.5 kU/L): aOR 0.67 (0.47-0.96) and aOR 0.42 (0.19-0.92), respectively, and sensitization to horse dander: aOR 0.50 (95% CI 0.28-0.87). The associations were observed in all four subpopulations and independent of farm-related co-exposures. Other farm-produced products were not independently related to any allergy-related health outcome.
Our results indicate that consumption of farm milk may offer protection against asthma and allergy. A deepened understanding of the relevant protective components of farm milk and a better insight into the biological mechanisms underlying this association are warranted as a basis for the development of a safe product for prevention.
饮食干预作为预防特应性疾病的一种手段引起了极大关注。一些在农村环境中的研究称,食用农场生产的乳制品与过敏性疾病的患病率呈负相关,但目前的证据存在争议。
探讨与商店购买的产品相比,食用农场生产的产品是否与哮喘和过敏的较低患病率相关。
进行横断面多中心研究(PARSIFAL),纳入来自五个欧洲国家的14893名5-13岁儿童(2823名来自农场家庭,4606名就读于史坦纳学校,以及5440名农场对照儿童和2024名史坦纳对照儿童)。完成一份包括饮食部分的详细问卷,并检测血清中过敏原特异性IgE。
终生饮用农场牛奶与哮喘呈统计学显著负相关:协变量调整优势比(aOR)为0.74[95%置信区间(CI)0.61-0.88],与 rhinoconjunctivitis(鼻结膜炎)呈负相关:aOR为0.56(0.43-0.73),对花粉和食物混合物fx5(临界值≥3.5 kU/L)致敏:aOR分别为0.67(0.47-0.96)和0.42(0.19-0.92),对马皮屑致敏:aOR为0.50(95%CI 0.28-0.87)。在所有四个亚组中均观察到这种关联,且与农场相关的共同暴露无关。其他农场生产的产品与任何过敏相关的健康结局均无独立关联。
我们的结果表明,饮用农场牛奶可能对哮喘和过敏具有保护作用。有必要深入了解农场牛奶的相关保护成分,并更好地洞察这种关联背后的生物学机制,以此作为开发安全预防产品的基础。