Fleischhacker W W, Miller C H, Schett P, Barnas C, Ehrmann H
Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck University Hospital, Austria.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;105(1):141-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02316879.
Akathisia usually consists of two components, subjective restlessness and typical movements such as shuffling of the legs, pacing, shifting weight from one leg to the other, and rocking movements of the trunk. The ability to measure akathisia reliably is essential for the assessment of treatments for akathisia and for the evaluation of drug-induced side effects in general. To date, investigators have generally used self-constructed assessment scales without reporting data about reliability or validity. The Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS) has two subjective and three objective items for which anchored rating points are provided. Reliability was 0.89 for the HAS total score. Reliability for rating subjective symptoms ranged from 0.86 to 0.92, and the objective scores ranged from 0.51 to 0.89. The correlation between HAS and a global assessment of akathisia (modified CGI) was 0.87. These values compare favorably with the original report on the scale indicating that the Hillside Akathisia Scale can validly quantify akathisia with a satisfactory degree of interrater reliability.
静坐不能通常由两个部分组成,即主观上的坐立不安以及典型动作,如腿部拖曳、踱步、双腿交替重心转移和躯干摇晃动作。可靠地测量静坐不能的能力对于评估静坐不能的治疗方法以及总体评估药物引起的副作用至关重要。迄今为止,研究人员通常使用自行构建的评估量表,却未报告有关信度或效度的数据。希尔斯代德静坐不能量表(HAS)有两个主观项目和三个客观项目,并提供了锚定评分点。HAS总分的信度为0.89。主观症状评分的信度范围为0.86至0.92,客观评分范围为0.51至0.89。HAS与静坐不能整体评估(改良版临床总体印象量表)之间的相关性为0.87。这些数值与该量表的原始报告相比很有利,表明希尔斯代德静坐不能量表能够有效地量化静坐不能,且具有令人满意的评分者间信度。