Suppr超能文献

对门诊慢性心力衰竭患者群体中两种情绪自我报告筛查方法的评估。

An evaluation of two self-report screening measures for mood in an out-patient chronic heart failure population.

作者信息

Haworth J E, Moniz-Cook E, Clark A L, Wang M, Cleland J G F

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;22(11):1147-53. doi: 10.1002/gps.1807.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the criterion validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item (GDS-15) in a community sample of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) out-patients.

METHODS

Eighty-eight of 203 older adults with confirmed CHF responded to a postal survey and participated in a face-to-face interview. The GDS-15 and HADS were compared to diagnoses from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I), using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity for various cut-off points.

RESULTS

For all depressive disorders, the area under the ROC curve for the GDS-15 was 0.883 and a cut-off of 5 gave a sensitivity of 0.818 and a specificity of 0.833. The area under the ROC curve for the HADS Depression (D) and Anxiety (A) were 0.889 and 0.941 respectively. At a cut-off of 7, the HADS-A gave a sensitivity of 0.938 and a specificity of 0.847. At a cut-off of 4, the HADS-D gave a sensitivity of 0.864 and a specificity of 0.788.

CONCLUSIONS

The GDS-15 and HADS are valid screening tools for detecting depression in aged CHF out-patients. However, use of the HADS requires reduced cut-points to ensure that patients with mood disorder are not missed in this population.

摘要

目的

在慢性心力衰竭(CHF)门诊患者的社区样本中检验医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和老年抑郁量表15项版(GDS - 15)的效标效度。

方法

203名确诊为CHF的老年人中有88人回复了邮寄调查问卷并参与了面对面访谈。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以及不同切点的阳性和阴性预测值、敏感性和特异性,将GDS - 15和HADS与DSM - IV结构化临床访谈(SCID - I)的诊断结果进行比较。

结果

对于所有抑郁症,GDS - 15的ROC曲线下面积为0.883,切点为5时,敏感性为0.818,特异性为0.833。HADS抑郁(D)和焦虑(A)分量表的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.889和0.941。切点为7时,HADS - A的敏感性为0.938,特异性为0.847。切点为4时,HADS - D的敏感性为0.864,特异性为0.788。

结论

GDS - 15和HADS是检测老年CHF门诊患者抑郁的有效筛查工具。然而,使用HADS时需要降低切点,以确保该人群中不遗漏情绪障碍患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验