University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mult Scler. 2009 Dec;15(12):1518-24. doi: 10.1177/1352458509347150. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
Detecting clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety in medically ill patients using self-report rating scales presents a challenge because of somatic confounders. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was developed with this in mind, but has never been validated for a multiple sclerosis population. Our objective was to validate the HADS for multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple sclerosis patients were interviewed for the presence of major depression (n = 180) and anxiety disorders (n = 140) with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was undertaken to assess which HADS cut-off scores give the best yield with respect to diagnoses of major depression and all anxiety disorders defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. A threshold score of 8 or greater on the HADS depression subscale provides a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87.3% (ROC area under the curve 0.938). The same cut-off score gives a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 80.7% on the anxiety subscale (ROC area under the curve 0.913), but for generalized anxiety disorder only. The study confirms the usefulness of the HADS as a marker of major depression and generalized anxiety disorder, but not other anxiety disorders, in multiple sclerosis patients.
使用自我报告评分量表检测患有医学疾病的患者中具有临床意义的抑郁和焦虑症状是一项挑战,因为存在躯体混杂因素。考虑到这一点,开发了医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),但从未对多发性硬化症患者进行过验证。我们的目的是验证 HADS 在多发性硬化症患者中的适用性。通过DSM-IV 障碍的结构性临床访谈,对多发性硬化症患者进行了主要抑郁症(n=180)和焦虑障碍(n=140)的访谈。进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估 HADS 截断分数在多大程度上可以针对 DSM-IV 结构性临床访谈定义的主要抑郁症和所有焦虑障碍做出最佳诊断。HADS 抑郁分量表得分为 8 或更高分可提供 90%的敏感性和 87.3%的特异性(ROC 曲线下面积 0.938)。相同的截断分数在焦虑分量表上的敏感性为 88.5%,特异性为 80.7%(ROC 曲线下面积 0.913),但仅适用于广泛性焦虑障碍。该研究证实了 HADS 作为多发性硬化症患者中主要抑郁症和广泛性焦虑障碍的标志物的有用性,但不能作为其他焦虑障碍的标志物。