Fedders M, Hartmann M, Schneider A, Kath R, Camara O, Oelschläger H
FSU Hospital Pharmacy, Erlanger Allee 101, 07743 Jena, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep;133(9):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0210-4. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
So far there is no analysis available on the cost effectiveness of the paclitaxel/platinum-analogue combination versus carboplatin monotherapy with ovarian cancer. Up-to-now only a cost-utility analysis on ovarian carcinoma has been published (Ortega et al. in Gynecol Oncol 66(3):454-463, 1997), which in addition to the first-line chemotherapy included second-line chemotherapy with effectiveness and cost data in the analysis. Therefore, within the scope of our study the cost effectiveness of platinum analogues and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy as well as topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin as second-lie chemotherapy was to be determined with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
For this purpose a decision-making Markov model was developed which represents the medical and economic consequences of the administration of paclitaxel and platinum derivatives in first-line chemotherapy and the administration of topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma by means of data from the literature. Patients were treated either in the early (FIGO stage I-IIa) or advanced stage (FIGO stage IIb-IV).
The therapeutic strategy caboplatin followed by topotecan costs 20,123.91 euros, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by liposomal doxorubicin 22,336.57 euros, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/pactlitaxel followed by liposomal topotecan 29,820.64 euros and the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by liposomal doxorubicin 31,560.47 euros from the time of diagnosis until death or survival within 5 years. With lives saved, accordingly of 2.55, 2.70, 2.60 and 2.65 years' costs amounted to 7,891 euros, 8,270.35 euros, and 11,453.62 euros per year of life saved.
Based on the threshold value of social willingness to pay 45,500 euros per year of life saved, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by topotecan, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by liposomal doxorubicin, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by topotcan and the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by liposomal doxorubicin can be evaluated to be cost effective.
目前尚无关于紫杉醇/铂类类似物联合疗法与卡铂单药疗法治疗卵巢癌的成本效益分析。到目前为止,仅发表了一项关于卵巢癌的成本效用分析(Ortega等人,《妇科肿瘤学》,第66卷第3期,第454 - 463页,1997年),该分析除了一线化疗外,还在分析中纳入了二线化疗的有效性和成本数据。因此,在我们的研究范围内,要确定铂类类似物和紫杉醇作为一线化疗以及拓扑替康和脂质体阿霉素作为二线化疗治疗上皮性卵巢癌的成本效益。
为此开发了一个决策马尔可夫模型,该模型通过文献数据呈现了上皮性卵巢癌一线化疗中使用紫杉醇和铂类衍生物以及二线化疗中使用拓扑替康和脂质体阿霉素给药的医学和经济后果。患者分别处于早期(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期I - IIa)或晚期(FIGO分期IIb - IV)。
从诊断到死亡或5年内存活,卡铂序贯拓扑替康的治疗策略成本为20,123.91欧元,卡铂序贯脂质体阿霉素的治疗策略成本为22,336.57欧元,卡铂/紫杉醇序贯脂质体拓扑替康的治疗策略成本为29,820.64欧元,卡铂/紫杉醇序贯脂质体阿霉素的治疗策略成本为31,560.47欧元。相应地,挽救的生命年数分别为2.55年、2.70年、2.60年和2.65年,每挽救一年生命的成本分别为7,891欧元、8,270.35欧元和11,453.62欧元。
基于社会支付意愿阈值为每挽救一年生命45,500欧元,卡铂序贯拓扑替康的治疗策略、卡铂序贯脂质体阿霉素的治疗策略、卡铂/紫杉醇序贯拓扑替康的治疗策略以及卡铂/紫杉醇序贯脂质体阿霉素的治疗策略可被评估为具有成本效益。