Young J, Gilbert A I, Graham M F
Hernia Institute of Florida, 6200 Sunset Drive, Miami, FL 33143, USA.
Hernia. 2007 Aug;11(4):347-51. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0227-2. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
The diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias is not always straightforward and may require additional investigative modalities. Real-time ultrasound is accurate, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and readily available. The value of ultrasound as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias in both pre-operative and post-operative patients was studied.
Retrospective analysis of 200 patients treated at the Hernia Institute of Florida was carried out. In these cases, ultrasound had been used to assist with case management. Patients without previous hernia surgery and those with early and late post-herniorrhaphy complaints were studied. Patients with obvious hernias were excluded. Indications for ultrasound examination included patients with abdominal pain without a palpable hernia, a palpable mass of questionable etiology, and patients with inordinate pain or excessive swelling during the early post-operative period. Patients were treated with surgery or conservative therapy depending on the results of the physical examination and ultrasound studies. Cases in which the ultrasound findings influenced the decision-making process by confirming clinical findings or altering the diagnosis and changing the treatment plan are discussed.
Of the 200 patients, 144 complained of pain alone and on physical exam no hernia or mass was palpable. Of these 144 patients with pain alone, 21 had a hernia identified on the US examination and were referred for surgery. The 108 that had a negative ultrasound were treated conservatively with rest, heat, and anti-inflammatory drugs, most often with excellent results. Of the 56 remaining patients who had a mass, with or without pain, 22 had hernias identified by means of ultrasound examination. In the other 34, the etiology of the mass was not a hernia.
Abdominal wall ultrasound is a valuable tool in the scheme of management of patients in whom the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernia is unclear. Therapeutic decisions can be influenced by the ultrasound findings that can provide more efficient and economical treatment by expediting their clinical management.
腹壁疝的诊断并非总是一目了然,可能需要其他检查手段。实时超声检查准确、无创、相对便宜且易于获得。本研究探讨了超声作为辅助工具在腹壁疝术前和术后患者诊断中的价值。
对佛罗里达疝研究所治疗的200例患者进行回顾性分析。在这些病例中,超声被用于辅助病例管理。研究了未接受过疝手术的患者以及疝修补术后早期和晚期出现不适的患者。排除有明显疝的患者。超声检查的适应证包括无明显可触及疝的腹痛患者、病因不明的可触及肿块患者以及术后早期疼痛异常或肿胀过度的患者。根据体格检查和超声检查结果,患者接受手术或保守治疗。讨论了超声检查结果通过确认临床发现、改变诊断或改变治疗方案而影响决策过程的病例。
200例患者中,144例仅主诉疼痛,体格检查未触及疝或肿块。在这144例仅疼痛的患者中,21例经超声检查发现有疝并被转诊进行手术。超声检查阴性的108例患者接受休息、热敷和抗炎药物等保守治疗,大多数效果良好。其余56例有肿块的患者,无论有无疼痛,22例经超声检查发现有疝。另外34例肿块的病因不是疝。
腹壁超声是诊断不明的腹壁疝患者管理方案中的一项有价值的工具。超声检查结果可影响治疗决策,通过加快临床管理,可提供更高效、经济的治疗。