DeGroot L J, Kaplan E L
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Ill. 60637.
Surgery. 1991 Dec;110(6):936-9; discussion 939-40.
The role of elective completion thyroidectomy after lobectomy for differentiated thyroid cancers remains controversial. The potential benefit of tumor removal by the second procedure is considered by some to be overbalanced by a prohibitive operative morbidity rate. During a 20-year period at the University of Chicago Medical Center, 26 patients underwent completion thyroidectomy within a 6-month period of the original thyroid operation. This group represents 8% of the 326 patients who underwent surgery during that time for differentiated thyroid cancer (269 papillary and 57 follicular). Of the 26 patients, 18 had papillary and eight had follicular cancers. The average size was 2.5 cm, with 24 of 26 being greater than 1 cm in diameter. At the first operation, 81% of tumors were intrathyroidal. Eight percent had lymph node metastases and 12% manifested local invasion. Tumor was found in eight (31%) of 26 of the reoperative specimens. The incidence of tumor did not vary by histologic type but did differ according to the extent of the original operation. Cancer was found in 50% (three of six) of those who had undergone previous partial lobectomy, in 33% (five of 15) of those after a total lobectomy, and in none of five who had undergone a prior bilateral (although incomplete) thyroid resection. One permanent recurrent nerve injury occurred at the first operation. No additional recurrent nerve injuries or hypoparathyroidism occurred as a result of the second operation. Finally, no disease characteristic of the initial tumor (e.g., size, clinical class, tumor capsular invasion, multifocality, thyroiditis, or extrathyroidal tumor invasiveness) predicted the presence or absence of tumor on the second side. We conclude that completion thyroidectomy is appropriate for patients with lesions 1 cm or greater who have undergone lobectomy or less at the original operation, because 40% of such patients would be expected to have residual cancer. With care, this operation can be performed with minimal morbidity.
对于分化型甲状腺癌,在叶切除术后行选择性甲状腺全切术的作用仍存在争议。一些人认为,二次手术切除肿瘤的潜在益处被过高的手术发病率所抵消。在芝加哥大学医学中心的20年期间,26例患者在初次甲状腺手术的6个月内接受了甲状腺全切术。该组患者占同期因分化型甲状腺癌接受手术的326例患者的8%(269例乳头状癌和57例滤泡状癌)。26例患者中,18例为乳头状癌,8例为滤泡状癌。平均大小为2.5 cm,26例中有24例直径大于1 cm。在初次手术时,81%的肿瘤位于甲状腺内。8%有淋巴结转移,12%有局部侵犯。在26例再次手术标本中,8例(31%)发现有肿瘤。肿瘤的发生率不因组织学类型而异,但根据初次手术的范围而有所不同。在先前接受部分叶切除术的患者中,50%(6例中的3例)发现有癌症,在全叶切除术后的患者中,33%(15例中的5例)发现有癌症,而在先前接受双侧(尽管不完全)甲状腺切除术的5例患者中均未发现癌症。初次手术时发生1例永久性喉返神经损伤。二次手术未导致额外的喉返神经损伤或甲状旁腺功能减退。最后,没有初始肿瘤的疾病特征(如大小、临床分级、肿瘤包膜侵犯、多灶性、甲状腺炎或甲状腺外肿瘤侵袭性)能够预测对侧是否存在肿瘤。我们得出结论,对于初次手术时接受叶切除术或更少切除范围且病变直径1 cm或更大的患者,甲状腺全切术是合适的,因为预计此类患者中有40%会有残留癌。谨慎操作的话,该手术可以在发病率极低的情况下进行。