• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[针对社区居住老年人的残疾预防项目的经济评估——对项目参与者和非参与者的医疗及护理费用进行的长期趋势分析]

[Economic evaluation of disability prevention programs for community-dwelling elderly secular trend analyses of medical and care expenses comparing participants and non-participants in the programs].

作者信息

Yoshida Hiroto, Fujiwara Yoshinori, Amano Hidenori, Kumagai Shu, Watanabe Naoki, Sangyoon Lee, Mori Setuko, Shinkai Shoji

机构信息

Research Team for Social Participation and Health Promotion, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.

出版信息

Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2007 Mar;54(3):156-67.

PMID:17461027
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate disability prevention programs for community-dwelling elderly in terms of the cost/benefit balance.

METHODS

Out of all residents aged 65 years and over who lived in Yoita Town, Niigata Prefecture, Japan (n = 1,673), 1,544 persons participated in the baseline survey conducted in November, 2000 (response rate, 92.2%). Based on the results, Yoita town then launched several kinds of disability prevention programs for community-dwelling elderly, e.g., preventive programs for falls, dementia and homeboundness. The subjects for the present study included only those aged 70 years and over who responded to the baseline survey and were alive as of March 2004. During 2001 to 2003, 146 persons had participated at lease once in one of disability prevention programs (denoted as the participant group), whereas 846 persons had not participated in any of the programs (denoted as the non-participant group). We compared medical and care expenses (sum of national and employment health insurance benefits, and long-term care insurance) between the two groups during 2000-2003, and determined whether participating in program affected subsequent medical and care expenses independent of key confounders [sex, age, and baseline medical and care expenses or health indicator (TMIG-Index of Competence or Generic Mobility Index)], using general linear models.

RESULTS

The mean medical expenses per capita and per month slightly decreased over the period of the study in the participant group (51,606 yen for 2000 to 47,539 yen for 2003), while those in non-participant group steadily increased (41,888 yen, to 51,558 yen, respectively). During the same period, the mean care cost per capita and per month increased in both groups, but the increase was much more moderate in the participating group (507 yen to 5,186 yen vs. 8,127 yen to 27,072 yen for non-participant group). Summed cost reduction through the program participation accounted for 49 million yen during the three years (2001-2003). After adjustment for sex, age and baseline medical and care expenses or health indicator, it was estimated as 12 million yen per year. Given that the expenses for the disability prevention programs summed 2.3 million yen per year, the net benefit of disability prevention programs was estimated to be approx. 10 million yen per year.

CONCLUSION

Disability preventive programs for the community-dwelling elderly are economically efficient in terms of the cost/benefit balance. Future research is needed to examine how such programs lead to cost reduction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从成本效益平衡的角度评估针对社区居住老年人的残疾预防项目。

方法

在日本新潟县余市町居住的所有65岁及以上居民(n = 1673)中,1544人参与了2000年11月进行的基线调查(回复率为92.2%)。基于该结果,余市町随后为社区居住老年人开展了多种残疾预防项目,例如预防跌倒、痴呆和居家不出的项目。本研究的对象仅包括那些在基线调查中做出回复且截至2004年3月仍在世的70岁及以上老年人。在2001年至2003年期间,146人至少参加过一次残疾预防项目(称为参与组),而846人未参加任何项目(称为非参与组)。我们比较了两组在2000 - 2003年期间的医疗和护理费用(国民健康保险和就业健康保险福利以及长期护理保险的总和),并使用一般线性模型确定参与项目是否会影响后续的医疗和护理费用,同时控制关键混杂因素[性别、年龄以及基线医疗和护理费用或健康指标(TMIG能力指数或通用活动能力指数)]。

结果

在研究期间,参与组的人均每月医疗费用略有下降(从2000年的51,606日元降至2003年的47,539日元),而非参与组的人均每月医疗费用稳步上升(分别从41,888日元升至51,558日元)。在同一时期,两组的人均每月护理费用均有所增加,但参与组的增加幅度要小得多(从507日元增至5186日元,而非参与组从8127日元增至27,072日元)。通过参与项目在三年(2001 - 2003年)期间总计节省成本4900万日元。在对性别、年龄以及基线医疗和护理费用或健康指标进行调整后,估计每年节省1200万日元。鉴于残疾预防项目每年的费用总计为230万日元,残疾预防项目的净效益估计约为每年1000万日元。

结论

针对社区居住老年人的残疾预防项目在成本效益平衡方面具有经济效率。未来需要开展研究以探讨此类项目如何实现成本降低。

相似文献

1
[Economic evaluation of disability prevention programs for community-dwelling elderly secular trend analyses of medical and care expenses comparing participants and non-participants in the programs].[针对社区居住老年人的残疾预防项目的经济评估——对项目参与者和非参与者的医疗及护理费用进行的长期趋势分析]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2007 Mar;54(3):156-67.
2
The long-term costs of public long-term care insurance in Germany. Some guesstimates.德国公共长期护理保险的长期成本。一些粗略估计。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1996;5:180-222.
3
[Health insurance and insurance for care and assistance for the elderly in Japanese neurosurgical consultation].[日本神经外科会诊中的医疗保险及老年人护理与援助保险]
No Shinkei Geka. 2001 Apr;29(4):367-70.
4
Assessing the effect of Taiwan's outpatient prescription drug copayment policy in the elderly.评估台湾门诊处方药共付政策对老年人的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1331-42. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100579.91550.C4.
5
Changes in drug utilization following the outpatient prescription drug cost-sharing program--evidence from Taiwan's elderly.门诊处方药费用分担计划实施后药物使用情况的变化——来自台湾老年人的证据
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):277-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.013.
6
Assessing costs and potential returns of evidence-based programs for seniors.评估针对老年人的循证项目的成本和潜在回报。
Eval Health Prof. 2011 Jun;34(2):201-25. doi: 10.1177/0163278710393955. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
7
[Increasing illegal employment in nursing: affordable nursing care--possible without moonlighting?].[护理行业非法就业现象增多:可负担得起的护理服务——不兼职是否可行?]
Pflege Z. 2007 Dec;60(12):654-9.
8
Costs of community care for disabled elderly persons: the policy implications.残疾老年人社区护理成本:政策影响
Inquiry. 1990 Spring;27(1):61-72.
9
[Comparison of expertises between long-term care insurance (SGB XI) and the law on ambulatory care for disabled individuals in Berlin (HPG)].[长期护理保险(SGB XI)与柏林残疾人门诊护理法(HPG)之间的专业知识比较]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Nov;64(11):578-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35522.
10
[Prevention before care. Prevention by care].护理前预防。通过护理进行预防。
Gesundheitswesen. 2004 May;66(5):311-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813145.