Muñoz-Laboy Miguel, Dodge Brian
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jun;97(6):1102-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078345. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
We sought to determine whether there were differences in sexual risk among behaviorally and self-identified bisexual men, men who reported having sex with both men and women without reporting a bisexual identity and men who self-identified as bisexual but reported only recent homosexual behavior over the past 6 months.
secondary data analysis, we conducted stepwise linear regression equation modeling to determine which factors were significant predictors of sexual risk among various subgroups of bisexual Latino men.
Having sex with women, regardless of sexual identity, increased the likelihood of insertive unprotected anal intercourse with men. Bisexual identity was not statistically associated with unprotected anal intercourse with men.
Future studies should begin to examine differences within groups rather than focusing on group comparisons that yield limited insights into sexual risk predictors for homosexually and bisexually active men. Further research that explores risk and protective factors in the sexual lives of Latino bisexual men is also needed.
我们试图确定在行为上和自我认定为双性恋的男性、报告与男性和女性都发生过性行为但未报告双性恋身份的男性，以及自我认定为双性恋但在过去6个月中仅报告近期有同性恋行为的男性之间，性风险是否存在差异。
通过二次数据分析，我们进行逐步线性回归方程建模，以确定哪些因素是双性恋拉丁裔男性各亚组中性风险的显著预测因素。
与女性发生性行为，无论性身份如何，都会增加与男性进行插入式无保护肛交的可能性。双性恋身份与与男性进行无保护肛交在统计学上无关联。
未来的研究应开始审视群体内部的差异，而不是专注于群体比较，因为这种比较对同性恋和双性恋活跃男性的性风险预测因素的洞察有限。还需要进一步研究探索拉丁裔双性恋男性性生活中的风险和保护因素。
